Efficient Post-Training Refinement of Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
Xinyuan Wang, Dongjie Wang, Wangyang Ying, Haoyue Bai, Nanxu Gong, Sixun Dong, Kunpeng Liu, Yanjie Fu
Abstract
Reasoning is a key component of language understanding in Large Language Models. While Chain-of-Thought prompting enhances performance via explicit intermediate steps, it suffers from sufficient token overhead and a fixed reasoning trajectory, preventing step-wise refinement. Recent advances in latent reasoning address these limitations by refining internal reasoning processes directly in the model’s latent space, without producing explicit outputs. However, a key challenge remains: how to effectively update reasoning embeddings during post-training to guide the model toward more accurate solutions. To overcome this challenge, we propose a lightweight post-training framework that refines latent reasoning trajectories using two novel strategies: (1) Contrastive reasoning feedback, which compares reasoning embeddings against strong and weak baselines to infer effective update directions via embedding enhancement; (2) Residual embedding refinement, which stabilizes updates by progressively integrating current and historical gradients, enabling fast yet controlled convergence. Extensive experiments and case studies are conducted on five reasoning benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Notably, a +5% accuracy gain on MathQA without additional training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 45a0f18a-04e2-434c-bd2c-e082f0a39ee2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language ModelsDenny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei et al.ICLR 2023 · 318 citations
- Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language ModelsZhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Alex SmolaICLR 2023 · 234 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking LLM Reasoning: From Explicit Trajectories to Latent RepresentationsCong Jiang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fangzhi Zhu, XiaoWei Chen et al.ICLR 2026
- Learning to Reason over Continuous Tokens with Reinforcement LearningYiran Zhao, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language ModelsRenyu Fu, Guibo LuoACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond Tokens: Dynamic Latent Reasoning via Semantic Residual RefinementFangrui Lv, Lei Wang, Ruixin Hong, Yong Du et al.AAAI 2026
- Latent Thoughts Tuning: Bridging Context and Reasoning with Fused Information in Latent TokensWeihao Liu, Dehai Min, Lu ChengICML 2026 · 3 citations
