Beyond Tokens: Dynamic Latent Reasoning via Semantic Residual Refinement
Fangrui Lv, Lei Wang, Ruixin Hong, Yong Du, Xiangyu Wu, Tingting Gao, Guorui Zhou, Changshui Zhang
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought prompting has remarkably advanced LLM reasoning by generating explicit step-by-step tokens, yet its discrete nature inherently limits expressiveness and efficiency, struggling with abstract, ambiguous, or semantically divergent cognition beyond linguistic tokens. Latent reasoning offers a promising alternative by operating in the model’s internal continuous space for richer cognitive representations. However, existing methods typically rely on finetuning or token interpolation to bridge latent and input spaces, introducing training difficulty or semantic degradation. To this end, we propose Dynamic Latent Reasoning (DyLaR), a training-free framework that preserves semantic fidelity to latent space. DyLaR introduces a Semantic Residual Refinement module that progressively refines latent inputs by integrating semantic residuals from prior hidden states, thus capturing expressive semantic hierarchies that closely approximate continuous latent representations. To enhance flexibility, DyLaR further incorporates a dynamic switching policy that allows LLMs to alternate between discrete and latent reasoning based on model uncertainty, favoring explicit reasoning when confident and latent exploration under ambiguity. Empirical experiments across knowledge- and reasoning-intensive tasks demonstrate that DyLaR consistently outperforms strong baselines in both effectiveness and token efficiency. Qualitative analyses further illustrate its interpretability and flexibility in navigating complex reasoning scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bcae4c98-2eae-4fee-9569-d05e87951d4dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
- MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction TuningXiang Yue, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang, Yao Fu et al.ICLR 2024 · 558 citations
Related papers
- SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMsDachuan Shi, Abedelkadir Asi, Keying Li, Xiangchi Yuan et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Learning to Reason over Continuous Tokens with Reinforcement LearningYiran Zhao, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning ChainsWenhui Tan, Jiaze Li, Jianzhong Ju, Zhenbo Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 103 citations
- SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language ModelsRenyu Fu, Guibo LuoACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Latent Thoughts Tuning: Bridging Context and Reasoning with Fused Information in Latent TokensWeihao Liu, Dehai Min, Lu ChengICML 2026 · 3 citations
