Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Alex Smola
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can perform complex reasoning by generating intermediate reasoning steps. Providing these steps for prompting demonstrations is called chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. CoT prompting has two major paradigms. One leverages a simple prompt like "Let's think step by step" to facilitate step-by-step thinking before answering a question. The other uses a few manual demonstrations one by one, each composed of a question and a reasoning chain that leads to an answer. The superior performance of the second paradigm hinges on the hand-crafting of task-specific demonstrations one by one. We show that such manual efforts may be eliminated by leveraging LLMs with the "Let's think step by step" prompt to generate reasoning chains for demonstrations one by one, i.e., let's think not just step by step, but also one by one. However, these generated chains often come with mistakes. To mitigate the effect of such mistakes, we find that diversity matters for automatically constructing demonstrations. We propose an automatic CoT prompting method: Auto-CoT. It samples questions with diversity and generates reasoning chains to construct demonstrations. On ten public benchmark reasoning tasks with GPT-3, Auto-CoT consistently matches or exceeds the performance of the CoT paradigm that requires manual designs of demonstrations. Code is available at https://github.com/amazon-research/auto-cot
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 397e0506-5dc1-4014-8c0f-64ada60708a2Cited by top-tier papers342
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-CorrectionMohammadreza Pourreza, Davood RafieiNeurIPS 2023 · 909 citations
- ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential LearnersAndrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin et al.AAAI 2024 · 484 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What MattersBoshi Wang, Sewon Min, Xiang Deng, Jiaming Shen et al.ACL 2023 · 100 citations
- Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning PatternsYufeng Zhang, Xuepeng Wang, Lingxiang Wu, Jinqiao WangAAAI 2025 · 27 citations
- Why Prompt Design Matters and Works: A Complexity Analysis of Prompt Search Space in LLMsXiang Zhang, Juntai Cao, Chenyu You, Dujian DingACL 2025 · 21 citations
- INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language ModelsChuyue Zhou, Wangjie You, Juntao Li, Jing Ye et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
