Explaining with Contrastive Phrasal Highlighting: A Case Study in Assisting Humans to Detect Translation Differences
Eleftheria Briakou, Navita Goyal, Marine Carpuat
Abstract
Explainable NLP techniques primarily explain by answering “Which tokens in the input are responsible for this prediction?”. We argue that for NLP models that make predictions by comparing two input texts, it is more useful to explain by answering “What differences between the two inputs explain this prediction?”. We introduce a technique to generate contrastive phrasal highlights that explain the predictions of a semantic divergence model via phrase alignment guided erasure. We show that the resulting highlights match human rationales of cross-lingual semantic differences better than popular post-hoc saliency techniques and that they successfully help people detect fine-grained meaning differences in human translations and critical machine translation errors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 450ca031-9f0a-4888-acdf-81acdbf7ae75Cited by top-tier papers6
- A Necessary Step toward Faithfulness: Measuring and Improving Consistency in Free-Text ExplanationsLingjun Zhao, Hal Daumé IIIEMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine TranslationMarine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- ES-MemEval: Benchmarking Conversational Agents on Personalized Long-Term Emotional SupportTiantian Chen, Jiaqi Lu, Ying Shen, Lin ZhangWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine TranslationDayeon Ki, Kevin Duh, Marine CarpuatEMNLP 2025
- Toward Machine Translation Literacy: How Lay Users Perceive and Rely on Imperfect TranslationsYimin Xiao, Yongle Zhang, Dayeon Ki, Calvin Bao et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on13
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?Peter Hase, Mohit BansalACL 2020 · 216 citations
- Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their NeedsHarini Suresh, Steven R. Gomez, Kevin K. Nam, Arvind SatyanarayanCHI 2021 · 115 citations
- Interpretation of NLP models through input marginalizationSiwon Kim, Jihun Yi, Eunji Kim, Sungroh YoonEMNLP 2020 · 41 citations
Related papers
- Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive ExplanationsKayo Yin, Graham NeubigEMNLP 2022 · 32 citations
- Contrastive Explanations for Model InterpretabilityAlon Jacovi, Swabha Swayamdipta, Shauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar et al.EMNLP 2021 · 12 citations
- KACE: Generating Knowledge Aware Contrastive Explanations for Natural Language InferenceQianglong Chen, Feng Ji, Xiangji Zeng, Feng-Lin Li et al.ACL 2021
- Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build PredictionsJavier Ferrando, Gerard I. Gállego, Ioannis Tsiamas, Marta R. Costa-jussàACL 2023 · 9 citations
- Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation FrameworkShuzhou Yuan, Jingyi Sun, Ran Zhang, Michael Färber et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
