Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation Framework
Shuzhou Yuan, Jingyi Sun, Ran Zhang, Michael Färber, Steffen Eger, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein
Abstract
Natural language explanations (NLEs) are commonly used to provide plausible free-text explanations of a model’s reasoning about its predictions. However, recent work has questioned their faithfulness, as they may not accurately reflect the model’s internal reasoning process regarding its predicted answer. In contrast, highlight explanations–input fragments critical for the model’s predicted answers–exhibit measurable faithfulness. Building on this foundation, we propose G-TEx, a Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation framework designed to enhance the faithfulness of NLEs. Specifically, highlight explanations are first extracted as faithful cues reflecting the model’s reasoning logic toward answer prediction. They are subsequently encoded through a graph neural network layer to guide the NLE generation, which aligns the generated explanations with the model’s underlying reasoning toward the predicted answer. Experiments on both encoder-decoder and decoder-only models across three reasoning datasets demonstrate that G-TEx improves NLE faithfulness by up to 12.18% compared to baseline methods. Additionally, G-TEx generates NLEs with greater semantic and lexical similarity to human-written ones. Human evaluations show that G-TEx can decrease redundant content and enhance the overall quality of NLEs. Our work presents a novel method for explicitly guiding NLE generation to enhance faithfulness, serving as a foundation for addressing broader criteria in NLE and generated text.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3cb72765-c645-4166-aed3-df87ee9f623dCited by top-tier papers2
- Explaining Sources of Uncertainty in Automated Fact-CheckingJingyi Sun, Greta Warren, Irina Shklovski, Isabelle AugensteinACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language ExplanationsYingming Wang, Pepa AtanasovaEMNLP 2025
Builds on16
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
Related papers
- Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language ExplanationsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Oana Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Julian J. McAuleyICML 2022 · 40 citations
- From Nodes to Narratives: Explaining Graph Neural Networks with LLMs and Graph ContextPeyman Baghershahi, Gregoire Fournier, Pranav Nyati, Sourav MedyaACL 2026 · 9 citations
- LiTEx: A Linguistic Taxonomy of Explanations for Understanding Within-Label Variation in Natural Language InferencePingjun Hong, Beiduo Chen, Siyao Peng, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by ConstructionSarthak Jain, Sarah Wiegreffe, Yuval Pinter, Byron C. WallaceACL 2020
- LIREx: Augmenting Language Inference with Relevant ExplanationsXinyan Zhao, V. G. Vinod VydiswaranAAAI 2021 · 41 citations
