Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale Tuning
Sohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji Krishnamurthy
Abstract
LLMssuch as GPT-4 have shown a remarkable ability to solve complex questions by generating step-by-step rationales. Prior works have utilized this capability to improve smaller and cheaper LMs (say, with 7B parameters). However, various practical constraints, such as copyright and legal issues, owing to lack of transparency in the pre-training data of large (often closed) models, prevent their use in commercial settings. Little focus has been given to improving the innate reasoning ability of smaller models without distilling information from larger LLMs. To address this, we propose COLLATE, a trainable framework that tunes a (small) LLM to generate those outputs from a pool of diverse rationales that selectively improves the downstream task. COLLATE enforces multiple instances of the same LLM to exhibit distinct behavior and employs them to generate rationales to obtain diverse outputs. The LLM is then tuned via preference optimization to choose the candidate rationale which maximizes the likelihood of ground-truth answer. COLLATE outperforms several trainable and prompting baselines on 5 datasets across 3 domains: maths problem solving, natural language inference, and commonsense reasoning. We show the eff icacy of COLLATE on LLMs from different model families across varying parameter scales (1B to 8B) and demonstrate the benefit of multiple rationale providers guided by the end task through ablations. Code is released here (https://github.com/Sohanpatnaik106/collate).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- It Helps to Take a Second Opinion: Teaching Smaller LLMs To Deliberate Mutually via Selective Rationale OptimisationSohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji KrishnamurthyICLR 2025
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
- JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis ModelsKun Zhou, Beichen Zhang, Jiapeng Wang, Zhipeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 62 citations
- PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem SolvingMihir Parmar, Palash Goyal, Xin Liu, Yiwen Song et al.EMNLP 2025
- Small Language Models Fine-tuned to Coordinate Larger Language Models improve Complex ReasoningGurusha Juneja, Subhabrata Dutta, Soumen Chakrabarti, Sunny Manchanda et al.EMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
