PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving
Mihir Parmar, Palash Goyal, Xin Liu, Yiwen Song, Mingyang Ling, Chitta Baral, Hamid Palangi, Tomas Pfister
Abstract
Recently, decomposing complex problems into simple subtasks-a crucial part of human-like natural planning-to solve the given problem has significantly boosted the performance of large language models (LLMs). However, leveraging such planning structures during post-training to boost the performance of smaller open-source LLMs remains underexplored. Motivated by this, we introduce PLAN-TUNING, a unified post-training framework that (i) distills synthetic task decompositions (termed "planning trajectories") from largescale LLMs and (ii) fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives designed to mimic these planning processes to improve complex reasoning. On GSM8k and the MATH benchmarks, plantuned models outperform strong baselines by an average ∼ 7%. Furthermore, plan-tuned models show better generalization capabilities on out-of-domain datasets, with average ∼ 10% and ∼ 12% performance improvements on OlympiadBench and AIME 2024, respectively. Our detailed analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities, showing that PLAN-TUNING is an effective strategy for improving task-specific performance of smaller LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 30f15f57-894f-4bfb-83d4-29cf44803e3dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language ModelsHaoxiang Sun, Yingqian Min, Zhipeng Chen, Xin Zhao et al.ACL 2026 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking LLM Reasoning: From Explicit Trajectories to Latent RepresentationsCong Jiang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fangzhi Zhu, XiaoWei Chen et al.ICLR 2026
- UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-TuningMingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman OzdaglarNeurIPS 2025 · 61 citations
- LLMs Can Reason Faster Only If We Let ThemBilgehan Sel, Lifu Huang, Naren Ramakrishnan, Ruoxi Jia et al.ICML 2025
- Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale TuningSohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji KrishnamurthyACL 2025 · 2 citations
- DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories SearchMurong Yue, Wenlin Yao, Haitao Mi, Dian Yu et al.ICLR 2025
