The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning
Seungone Kim, Se June Joo, Doyoung Kim, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Jamin Shin, Minjoon Seo
Abstract
Language models (LMs) with less than 100B parameters are known to perform poorly on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in contrast to large LMs when solving unseen tasks. In this work, we aim to equip smaller LMs with the step-by-step reasoning capability by instruction tuning with CoT rationales. In order to achieve this goal, we first introduce a new instructiontuning dataset called the COT COLLECTION, which augments the existing Flan Collection (including only 9 CoT tasks) with additional 1.84 million rationales across 1,060 tasks. We show that CoT fine-tuning Flan-T5 (3B & 11B) with COT COLLECTION enables smaller LMs to have better CoT capabilities on unseen tasks. On the BIG-Bench-Hard (BBH) benchmark, we report an average improvement of +4.34% (Flan-T5 3B) and +2.60% (Flan-T5 11B), in terms of zero-shot task accuracy. Furthermore, we show that instruction tuning with COT COL-LECTION allows LMs to possess stronger fewshot learning capabilities on 4 domain-specific tasks, resulting in an improvement of +2.24% (Flan-T5 3B) and +2.37% (Flan-T5 11B), even outperforming ChatGPT utilizing demonstrations until the max length by a +13.98% margin. Our code, the COT COLLECTION data, and model checkpoints are publicly available 1 . * denotes equal contribution. Work was done while Seungone was interning at NAVER AI Lab.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers38
- Prometheus: Inducing Fine-Grained Evaluation Capability in Language ModelsSeungone Kim, Jamin Shin, Yejin Choi, Joel Jang et al.ICLR 2024 · 468 citations
- FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill SetsSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang et al.ICLR 2024 · 176 citations
- Training Large Language Models for Reasoning through Reverse Curriculum Reinforcement LearningZhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Boyang Hong, Senjie Jin et al.ICML 2024 · 70 citations
- OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL CyclesYihe Deng, Hritik Bansal, Fan Yin, Nanyun Peng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 61 citations
- Grounded Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language ModelsQiong Wu, Xiangcong Yang, Yiyi Zhou, Chenxin Fang et al.CVPR 2026 · 55 citations
Builds on31
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
Related papers
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 102 citations
- Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement LearningSimon Zhai, Hao Bai, Zipeng Lin, Jiayi Pan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 214 citations
- Revisiting Chain-of-Thought in Code Generation: Do Language Models Need to Learn Reasoning before Coding?Renbiao Liu, Anqi Li, Chaoding Yang, Hui Sun et al.ICML 2025
- Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for ReasoningYongqi Tong, Dawei Li, Sizhe Wang, Yujia Wang et al.ACL 2024
