SRATTA: Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning
Tanguy Marchand, Regis Loeb, Ulysse Marteau-Ferey, Jean Ogier du Terrail, Arthur Pignet
Abstract
We consider a cross-silo federated learning (FL) setting where a machine learning model with a fully connected first layer is trained between different clients and a central server using FedAvg, and where the aggregation step can be performed with secure aggregation (SA). We present SRATTA an attack relying only on aggregated models which, under realistic assumptions, (i) recovers data samples from the different clients, and (ii) groups data samples coming from the same client together. While sample recovery has already been explored in an FL setting, the ability to group samples per client, despite the use of SA, is novel. This poses a significant unforeseen security threat to FL and effectively breaks SA. We show that SRATTA is both theoretically grounded and can be used in practice on realistic models and datasets. We also propose counter-measures, and claim that clients should play an active role to guarantee their privacy during training. Recently, the efficiency of SA to prevent reconstruction attacks has been questioned, as gradient attacks Zhu et al. [2019] can recover samples from large batches of raw gradients Yin et al. [2021]. In the FL setting, recent attacks Geiping et al. ˚Alphabetical order
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Breaking Secure Aggregation: Label Leakage from Aggregated Gradients in Federated LearningZhibo Wang, Zhiwei Chang, Jiahui Hu, Xiaoyi Pang et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 10 citations
- Fisher Information-based Efficient Curriculum Federated Learning with Large Language ModelsJi Liu, Jiaxiang Ren, Ruoming Jin, Zijie Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Protection against Source Inference Attacks in Federated LearningAndreas Athanasiou, Kangsoo Jung, Catuscia PalamidessiICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- When Topology Betrays Privacy: Lattice-Based Reconstruction Attacks on Secure Aggregation in Decentralized Federated LearningWenrui Yu, Changlong Ji, Johannes Bjerva, Qiongxiu LiCCS 2026
Builds on13
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for VisionIlya O. Tolstikhin, Neil Houlsby, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas Beyer et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 3,862 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Property Inference Attacks on Fully Connected Neural Networks using Permutation Invariant RepresentationsKaran Ganju, Qi Wang, Wei Yang, Carl A. Gunter et al.CCS 2018 · 574 citations
Related papers
- Loki: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model ManipulationJoshua C. Zhao, Atul Sharma, Ahmed Roushdy Elkordy, Yahya H. Ezzeldin et al.S&P 2024 · 64 citations
- The Resource Problem of Using Linear Layer Leakage Attack in Federated LearningJoshua C. Zhao, Ahmed Roushdy Elkordy, Atul Sharma, Yahya H. Ezzeldin et al.CVPR 2023
- Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model InconsistencyDario Pasquini, Danilo Francati, Giuseppe AtenieseCCS 2022 · 92 citations
- Scale-MIA: A Scalable Model Inversion Attack against Secure Federated Learning via Latent Space ReconstructionShanghao Shi, Ning Wang, Yang Xiao, Chaoyu Zhang et al.NDSS 2025
- Gradient Disaggregation: Breaking Privacy in Federated Learning by Reconstructing the User Participant MatrixMaximilian Lam, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, Vijay Janapa Reddi et al.ICML 2021 · 78 citations
