Protection against Source Inference Attacks in Federated Learning
Andreas Athanasiou, Kangsoo Jung, Catuscia Palamidessi
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) was initially proposed as a privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm. However, FL has been shown to be susceptible to a series of privacy attacks. Recently, there has been concern about the Source Inference Attack (SIA), where an honest-but-curious central server attempts to identify exactly which client owns a given data point which was used in the training phase. Alarmingly, standard gradient obfuscation techniques with Differential Privacy have been shown to be ineffective against SIAs, at least without severely diminishing the accuracy.
In this work, we propose a defense against SIAs within the widely studied shuffle model of FL, where an honest shuffler acts as an intermediary between the clients and the server. First, we demonstrate that standard naive shuffling alone is insufficient to prevent SIAs. To effectively defend against SIAs, shuffling needs to be applied at a more granular level; we propose a novel combination of parameter-level shuffling with the residue number system (RNS). Our approach provides robust protection against SIAs without affecting the accuracy of the joint model and can be seamlessly integrated into other privacy protection mechanisms.
We conduct experiments on a series of models and datasets, confirming that standard shuffling approaches fail to prevent SIAs and that, in contrast, our proposed method reduces the attack’s accuracy to the level of random guessing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Adaptive Federated OptimizationSashank J. Reddi, Zachary Charles, Manzil Zaheer, Zachary Garrett et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,917 citations
- An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated LearningAvishek Ghosh, Jichan Chung, Dong Yin, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 1,329 citations
Related papers
- An Accuracy-Lossless Perturbation Method for Defending Privacy Attacks in Federated LearningXue Yang, Yan Feng, Weijun Fang, Jun Shao et al.WWW 2022 · 53 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Enhancing Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning via Learning Rate PerturbationGuangnian Wan, Haitao Du, Xuejing Yuan, Jun Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 2 citations
- Protect Privacy from Gradient Leakage Attack in Federated LearningJunxiao Wang, Song Guo, Xin Xie, Heng QiINFOCOM 2022 · 82 citations
- More than Enough is Too Much: Adaptive Defenses against Gradient Leakage in Production Federated LearningFei Wang, Ethan Hugh, Baochun LiINFOCOM 2023 · 25 citations
