When Topology Betrays Privacy: Lattice-Based Reconstruction Attacks on Secure Aggregation in Decentralized Federated Learning
Wenrui Yu, Changlong Ji, Johannes Bjerva, Qiongxiu Li
Abstract
Secure Aggregation (SA) is widely regarded as a strong defense against model-update leakage in Federated Learning (FL), as it reveals only aggregate results while hiding individual updates. In Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL), SA is commonly instantiated as local neighborhood aggregation, where each node obtains a weighted aggregate over its neighbors. We show that this locality creates a structural leakage surface: sparse decentralized topologies provide colluding semi-honest nodes with asymmetric aggregate views, exposing multiple hidden linear combinations of honest participants' private states. Reconstructing private states from these aggregate views is fundamentally challenging, as both the private states and the aggregation coefficients are hidden. We tackle this challenge by establishing a formal connection to the Hidden Subset Sum Problem, a long-studied problem in cryptography. Building on this formulation, we design a lattice-based reconstruction approach that combines lattice reduction with structural filtering to reconstruct protected model states. We evaluate our attack on image, tabular, and text tasks under sparse DFL topologies. Our results show that colluding semi-honest nodes can recover the original local updates of honest nodes, enabling downstream reconstruction of private training data. These findings demonstrate that SA alone does not guarantee privacy in DFL when local aggregation induces asymmetric observations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 07510ddd-1321-4283-a396-9e3fb7f3ed42Builds on17
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Decentralized Deep Learning with Arbitrary Communication CompressionAnastasia Koloskova, Tao Lin, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin JaggiICLR 2020 · 263 citations
Related papers
- The Resource Problem of Using Linear Layer Leakage Attack in Federated LearningJoshua C. Zhao, Ahmed Roushdy Elkordy, Atul Sharma, Yahya H. Ezzeldin et al.CVPR 2023
- SRATTA: Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated LearningTanguy Marchand, Regis Loeb, Ulysse Marteau-Ferey, Jean Ogier du Terrail et al.ICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Gradient Disaggregation: Breaking Privacy in Federated Learning by Reconstructing the User Participant MatrixMaximilian Lam, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, Vijay Janapa Reddi et al.ICML 2021 · 78 citations
- Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model InconsistencyDario Pasquini, Danilo Francati, Giuseppe AtenieseCCS 2022 · 92 citations
