Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People
Rie Kamikubo, Kyungjun Lee, Hernisa Kacorri
Abstract
To ensure that AI-infused systems work for disabled people, we need to bring accessibility datasets sourced from this community in the development lifecycle. However, there are many ethical and privacy concerns limiting greater data inclusion, making such datasets not readily available. We present a pair of studies where 13 blind participants engage in data capturing activities and reflect with and without probing on various factors that influence their decision to share their data via an AI dataset. We see how different factors influence blind participants' willingness to share study data as they assess risk-benefit tradeoffs. The majority support sharing of their data to improve technology but also express concerns over commercial use, associated metadata, and the lack of transparency about the impact of their data. These insights have implications for the development of responsible practices for stewarding accessibility datasets, and can contribute to broader discussions in this area.
• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Accessibility; • Social and professional topics → People with disabilities; • Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 40d8178a-b8e5-4a6f-b61a-31e8fa02484bCited by top-tier papers2
- The ORBIT India Dataset: Understanding the Challenges of Collecting a Disability-First AI Dataset in Low-Resource EnvironmentsGesu India, Martin Grayson, Cecily Morrison, Daniela Massiceti et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- How Multimodal Large Language Models Support Access to Visual Information: A Diary Study With Blind and Low Vision PeopleRicardo E. Gonzalez Penuela, Crescentia Jung, Sharon Y. Lin, Ruiying Hu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on8
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Transparency of CHI Research Artifacts: Results of a Self-Reported SurveyChat Wacharamanotham, Lukas Eisenring, Steve Haroz, Florian EchtlerCHI 2020 · 120 citations
- ORBIT: A Real-World Few-Shot Dataset for Teachable Object RecognitionDaniela Massiceti, Luisa M. Zintgraf, John Bronskill, Lida Theodorou et al.ICCV 2021 · 55 citations
- Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind: A Two-way PerspectiveKyungjun Lee, Daisuke Sato, Saki Asakawa, Hernisa Kacorri et al.CHI 2020 · 43 citations
- Future Opportunities for IoT to Support People with Parkinson'sRoisin McNaney, Emmanuel Tsekleves, Jonathan SynnottCHI 2020 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Disability-First Design and Creation of A Dataset Showing Private Visual Information Collected With People Who Are BlindTanusree Sharma, Abigale Stangl, Lotus Zhang, Yu-Yun Tseng et al.CHI 2023 · 23 citations
- The Dilemma of Building Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Solutions For Workplace AccessibilityYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Karina Kohl, Rafael Prikladnicki et al.CHI 2025 · 12 citations
- "Game Changer" or "Overenthusiastic Drunk Acquaintance"? Generative AI Use by Blind and Low Vision Software Professionals in the WorkplaceYoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Lauren Shu, Stacy Branham et al.ICSE 2026
- Designing Accessible Obfuscation Support for Blind Individuals' Visual Privacy ManagementLotus Zhang, Abigale Stangl, Tanusree Sharma, Yu-Yun Tseng et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- Treading the Transparency Tightrope: A Taxonomy of Risks and Benefits of Foundation Model Data Transparency for Transparency AdvocatesMorgan Klaus Scheuerman, Wiebke Hutiri, Aida Rahmattalabi, Victoria Matthews et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
