Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users
Farnaz Zamiri Zeraati, Yang Trista Cao, Yuehan Qiao, Hal Daumé III, Hernisa Kacorri
Abstract
Prompting and steering techniques are well established in general-purpose generative AI, yet assistive visual question answering (VQA) tools for blind users still follow rigid interaction patterns with limited opportunities for customization. User control can be helpful when system responses are misaligned with their goals and contexts, a gap that becomes especially consequential for blind users that may rely on these systems for access. We invite 11 blind users to customize their interactions with a real-world conversational VQA system. Drawing on 418 interactions, reflections, and post-study interviews, we analyze prompting-based techniques participants adopted, including those introduced in the study and those developed independently in real-world settings. VQA interactions were often lengthy: participants averaged 3 turns, sometimes up to 21, with input text typically tenfold shorter than the responses they heard. Built on state-of-the-art LLMs, the system lacked verbosity controls, was limited in estimating distance in space and time, relied on inaccessible image framing, and offered little to no camera guidance. We discuss how customization techniques such as prompt engineering can help participants work around these limitations. Alongside a new publicly available dataset, we offer insights for interaction design at both query and system levels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4b307bcd-5d9c-4cb0-9a81-0d5ffa79d09fBuilds on17
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term MemoryWanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye et al.AAAI 2024 · 394 citations
- Promptify: Text-to-Image Generation through Interactive Prompt Exploration with Large Language ModelsStephen Brade, Bryan Wang, Maurício Sousa, Sageev Oore et al.UIST 2023 · 179 citations
Related papers
- Right this way: Can VLMs Guide Us to See More to Answer Questions?Li Liu, Diji Yang, Sijia Zhong, Kalyana Suma Sree Tholeti et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Understanding the Use of a Large Language Model-Powered Guide to Make Virtual Reality Accessible for Blind and Low Vision PeopleJazmin Collins, Sharon Y. Lin, Tianqi Liu, Andrea Stevenson Won et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- "This is My Fault", Really? Understanding Blind and Low-Vision People's Perception of Hallucination in Large Vision Language ModelsYilin Tang, Yuyang Fang, Tianle Wang, Lingyun Sun et al.UIST 2025 · 3 citations
- RAVEN: Realtime Accessibility in Virtual ENvironments for Blind and Low-Vision PeopleXinyun Cao, Kexin Phyllis Ju, Chenglin Li, Venkatesh Potluri et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- How Multimodal Large Language Models Support Access to Visual Information: A Diary Study With Blind and Low Vision PeopleRicardo E. Gonzalez Penuela, Crescentia Jung, Sharon Y. Lin, Ruiying Hu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
