The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-Learning
Xuezhou Zhang, Shubham Kumar Bharti, Yuzhe Ma, Adish Singla, Xiaojin Zhu
Abstract
We study the sample complexity of teaching, termed as ``teaching dimension" (TDim) in the literature, for the teaching-by-reinforcement paradigm, where the teacher guides the student through rewards. This is distinct from the teaching-by-demonstration paradigm motivated by robotics applications, where the teacher teaches by providing demonstrations of state/action trajectories. The teaching-by-reinforcement paradigm applies to a wider range of real-world settings where a demonstration is inconvenient, but has not been studied systematically. In this paper, we focus on a specific family of reinforcement learning algorithms, Q-learning, and characterize the TDim under different teachers with varying control power over the environment, and present matching optimal teaching algorithms. Our TDim results provide the minimum number of samples needed for reinforcement learning, and we discuss their connections to standard PAC-style RL sample complexity and teaching-by-demonstration sample complexity results. Our teaching algorithms have the potential to speed up RL agent learning in applications where a helpful teacher is available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 40d0aa6a-9db2-4069-a9fc-5fe31541c04fCited by top-tier papers5
- Nonparametric Iterative Machine TeachingChen Zhang, Xiaofeng Cao, Weiyang Liu, Ivor W. Tsang et al.ICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Nonparametric Teaching for Multiple LearnersChen Zhang, Xiaofeng Cao, Weiyang Liu, Ivor W. Tsang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- On a Combinatorial Problem Arising in Machine TeachingJoakim Sunde, Brigt Arve Toppe Håvardstun, Jan Kratochvíl, Jan Arne TelleICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Teaching via Best-Case Counterexamples in the Learning-with-Equivalence-Queries ParadigmAkash Kumar, Yuxin Chen, Adish SinglaNeurIPS 2021 · 4 citations
- Nonparametric Teaching for Graph Property LearnersChen Zhang, Weixin Bu, Zeyi Ren, Zhengwu Liu et al.ICML 2025
Builds on3
- Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement LearningXuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe Ma, Adish Singla, Xiaojin ZhuICML 2020 · 154 citations
- Policy Teaching via Environment Poisoning: Training-time Adversarial Attacks against Reinforcement LearningAmin Rakhsha, Goran Radanovic, Rati Devidze, Xiaojin Zhu et al.ICML 2020 · 145 citations
- Toward the Fundamental Limits of Imitation LearningNived Rajaraman, Lin F. Yang, Jiantao Jiao, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 137 citations
Related papers
- Near Instance-Optimal PAC Reinforcement Learning for Deterministic MDPsAndrea Tirinzoni, Aymen Al Marjani, Emilie KaufmannNeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
- On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning LearnersShubham Kumar Bharti, Stephen Wright, Adish Singla, Xiaojin (Jerry) ZhuNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- An Enhanced Advising Model in Teacher-Student Framework using State CategorizationDaksh Anand, Vaibhav Gupta, Praveen Paruchuri, Balaraman RavindranAAAI 2021 · 9 citations
- Settling the Horizon-Dependence of Sample Complexity in Reinforcement LearningYuanzhi Li, Ruosong Wang, Lin F. YangFOCS 2021 · 3 citations
- Quantum algorithms for reinforcement learning with a generative modelDaochen Wang, Aarthi Sundaram, Robin Kothari, Ashish Kapoor et al.ICML 2021 · 38 citations
