Get an A in Math: Progressive Rectification Prompting
Zhenyu Wu, Meng Jiang, Chao Shen
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting methods have enabled large language models (LLMs) to generate reasoning paths and solve math word problems (MWPs). However, they are sensitive to mistakes in the paths, as any mistake can result in an incorrect answer. We propose a novel method named Progressive Rectification Prompting (PRP) to improve average accuracy on eight MWP datasets from 77.3 to 90.5. Given an initial answer from CoT, PRP iterates a verify-then-rectify process to progressively identify incorrect answers and rectify the reasoning paths. With the most likely correct answer, the LLM predicts a masked numerical value in the question; if the prediction does not match the masked value, the answer is likely incorrect. Then the LLM is prompted to re-generate the reasoning path hinted with a set of incorrect answers to prevent itself from repeating previous mistakes. PRP achieves the best performance compared against the CoT methods. Our implementation is made publicly available at https://wzy6642.github.io/prp.github.io/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3e87970b-9e1d-4fca-9b41-ac335febb9deCited by top-tier papers4
- Toward Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Models with Thought RollbackSijia Chen, Baochun LiICML 2024 · 18 citations
- VCR: A "Cone of Experience" Driven Synthetic Data Generation Framework for Mathematical ReasoningSannyuya Liu, Jintian Feng, Xiaoxuan Shen, Shengyingjie Liu et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition VerificationZhenyu Wu, Qingkai Zeng, Zhihan Zhang, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- PILOT: Planning via Internalized Latent Optimization Trajectories for Large Language ModelsHaoyu Zheng, Yun Zhu, Yuqian Yuan, Bo Yuan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language ModelsZhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Alex SmolaICLR 2023 · 234 citations
Related papers
- Premise-Augmented Reasoning Chains Improve Error Identification in Math reasoning with LLMsSagnik Mukherjee, Abhinav Chinta, Takyoung Kim, Tarun Anoop Sharma et al.ICML 2025
- Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs by Stepwise CorrectionZhenyu Wu, Qingkai Zeng, Zhihan Zhang, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.ACL 2025
- No Need for Explanations: LLMs can implicitly learn from mistakes in-contextLisa Alazraki, Maximilian Mozes, Jon Ander Campos, Yi Chern Tan et al.EMNLP 2025
- Fewer is More: Boosting Math Reasoning with Reinforced Context PruningXijie Huang, Li Lyna Zhang, Kwang-Ting Cheng, Fan Yang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- Plan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-ThoughtsTengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Yuqing Yang, Xiangkun Hu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 7 citations
