Social Dynamics of AI Support in Creative Writing
Katy Ilonka Gero, Tao Long, Lydia B. Chilton
Abstract
Recently, large language models have made huge advances in generating coherent, creative text. While much research focuses on how users can interact with language models, less work considers the social-technical gap that this technology poses. What are the social nuances that underlie receiving support from a generative AI? In this work we ask when and why a creative writer might turn to a computer versus a peer or mentor for support. We interview 20 creative writers about their writing practice and their attitudes towards both human and computer support. We discover three elements that govern a writer’s interaction with support actors: 1) what writers desire help with, 2) how writers perceive potential support actors, and 3) the values writers hold. We align our results with existing frameworks of writing cognition and creativity support, uncovering the social dynamics which modulate user responses to generative technologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3afb3c1a-f63f-4047-a3ce-7ab506544aa5Cited by top-tier papers48
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of CreativityTuhin Chakrabarty, Philippe Laban, Divyansh Agarwal, Smaranda Muresan et al.CHI 2024 · 122 citations
- How Knowledge Workers Think Generative AI Will (Not) Transform Their IndustriesAllison Woodruff, Renee Shelby, Patrick Gage Kelley, Steven Rousso-Schindler et al.CHI 2024 · 109 citations
- Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationAriel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han et al.CHI 2024 · 104 citations
- Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and StrategiesYuan Sun, Eunchae Jang, Fenglong Ma, Ting WangCHI 2024 · 63 citations
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model PromptsTongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, Carrie Jun CaiCHI 2022 · 465 citations
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
- TaleBrush: Sketching Stories with Generative Pretrained Language ModelsJohn Joon Young Chung, Wooseok Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Hwaran Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 202 citations
Related papers
- The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in WritingZhuoyan Li, Chen Liang, Jing Peng, Ming YinCHI 2024 · 78 citations
- Creative Writers' Attitudes on Writing as Training Data for Large Language ModelsKaty Ilonka Gero, Meera A. Desai, Carly Schnitzler, Nayun Eom et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- AI-Augmented Brainwriting: Investigating the use of LLMs in group ideationOrit Shaer, Angelora Cooper, Osnat Mokryn, Andrew L. Kun et al.CHI 2024 · 120 citations
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 20 citations
- The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive VisualizationMd. Naimul Hoque, Tasfia Mashiat, Bhavya Ghai, Cecilia D. Shelton et al.CHI 2024 · 48 citations
