Formal Analysis of BLE Secure Connection Pairing and Revelation of the PE Confusion Attack
Min Shi, Yongkang Xiao, Jing Chen, Kun He, Ruiying Du, Meng Jia
Abstract
—The Secure Connection (SC) pairing is the latest version of the security protocol designed to protect sensitive information transmitted over Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) channels. A formal and rigorous analysis of this protocol is essential for improving security assurances and identifying potential vulnerabilities. However, the complexity of the protocol flow, difficulties in formalizing pairing method selection, and overly idealized user assumptions present significant obstacles to such analysis. In this paper, we address these challenges and present an accurate and comprehensive formal analysis of the BLE-SC pairing protocol using Tamarin. We extract state machines for each participant as the blueprint for modeling the protocol, and we use an equational theory to formalize the pairing method selection logic. Our model incorporates subtle user behaviors and considers stronger adversary capabilities, including the potential compromise of private channels such as the temporary out-of-band channel. We develop a verification strategy to automate protocol analysis and implement a script to parallelize verification tasks across multiple servers. We verify 84 pairing cases and identify the minimal security assumptions required for the protocol. Moreover, our results reveal a new Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, which we call the PE confusion attack. We provide tools and Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits for simulating and understanding this attack within a controlled environment. Finally, we propose countermeasures to defend against this attack, improving the security of the BLE-SC pairing protocol.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39d93bb3-53c9-444a-b3ad-c0cab3420065Builds on16
- A Formal Analysis of 5G AuthenticationDavid A. Basin, Jannik Dreier, Lucca Hirschi, Sasa Radomirovic et al.CCS 2018 · 428 citations
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- Component-Based Formal Analysis of 5G-AKA: Channel Assumptions and Session ConfusionCas Cremers, Martin Dehnel-WildNDSS 2019 · 131 citations
- Automated Analysis and Verification of TLS 1.3: 0-RTT, Resumption and Delayed AuthenticationCas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Sam Scott, Thyla van der MerweS&P 2016 · 128 citations
- BIAS: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackSDaniele Antonioli, Nils Ole Tippenhauer, Kasper RasmussenS&P 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Formal Analysis and Patching of BLE-SC PairingMin Shi, Jing Chen, Kun He, Haoran Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Extrapolating Formal Analysis to Uncover Attacks in Bluetooth Passkey Entry PairingMohit Kumar Jangid, Yue Zhang, Zhiqiang LinNDSS 2023
- Method Confusion Attack on Bluetooth PairingMaximilian von Tschirschnitz, Ludwig Peuckert, Fabian Franzen, Jens GrossklagsS&P 2021 · 42 citations
- Breaking Secure Pairing of Bluetooth Low Energy Using Downgrade AttacksYue Zhang, Jian Weng, Rajib Dey, Yier Jin et al.USENIX Security 2020
- BLERP: BLE Re-Pairing Attacks and DefensesTommaso Sacchetti, Daniele AntonioliNDSS 2026 · 2 citations
