BIAS: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackS
Daniele Antonioli, Nils Ole Tippenhauer, Kasper Rasmussen
Abstract
Bluetooth (BR/EDR) is a pervasive technology for wireless communication used by billions of devices. The Bluetooth standard includes a legacy authentication procedure and a secure authentication procedure, allowing devices to authenticate to each other using a long term key. Those procedures are used during pairing and secure connection establishment to prevent impersonation attacks. In this paper, we show that the Bluetooth specification contains vulnerabilities enabling to perform impersonation attacks during secure connection establishment. Such vulnerabilities include the lack of mandatory mutual authentication, overly permissive role switching, and an authentication procedure downgrade. We describe each vulnerability in detail, and we exploit them to design, implement, and evaluate master and slave impersonation attacks on both the legacy authentication procedure and the secure authentication procedure. We refer to our attacks as Bluetooth Impersonation AttackS (BIAS).Our attacks are standard compliant, and are therefore effective against any standard compliant Bluetooth device regardless the Bluetooth version, the security mode (e.g., Secure Connections), the device manufacturer, and the implementation details. Our attacks are stealthy because the Bluetooth standard does not require to notify end users about the outcome of an authentication procedure, or the lack of mutual authentication. To confirm that the BIAS attacks are practical, we successfully conduct them against 31 Bluetooth devices (28 unique Bluetooth chips) from major hardware and software vendors, implementing all the major Bluetooth versions, including Apple, Qualcomm, Intel, Cypress, Broadcom, Samsung, and CSR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e60230cc-e8af-4b96-b434-b66a2efe33f4Cited by top-tier papers25
- LIGHTBLUE: Automatic Profile-Aware Debloating of Bluetooth StacksJianliang Wu, Ruoyu Wu, Daniele Antonioli, Mathias Payer et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 38 citations
- Formal Model-Driven Discovery of Bluetooth Protocol Design VulnerabilitiesJianliang Wu, Ruoyu Wu, Dongyan Xu, Dave Jing Tian et al.S&P 2022 · 36 citations
- SoK: The Long Journey of Exploiting and Defending the Legacy of King Harald BluetoothJianliang Wu, Ruoyu Wu, Dongyan Xu, Dave Jing Tian et al.S&P 2024 · 22 citations
- Every Byte Matters: Traffic Analysis of Bluetooth Wearable DevicesLudovic Barman, Alexandre Dumur, Apostolos Pyrgelis, Jean-Pierre HubauxUbiComp 2021 · 15 citations
- Protego: securing wireless communication via programmable metasurfaceXinyi Li, Chao Feng, Fengyi Song, Chenghan Jiang et al.MobiCom 2022 · 15 citations
Builds on2
- The KNOB is Broken: Exploiting Low Entropy in the Encryption Key Negotiation Of Bluetooth BR/EDRDaniele Antonioli, Nils Ole Tippenhauer, Kasper Bonne RasmussenUSENIX Security 2019 · 89 citations
- Nearby Threats: Reversing, Analyzing, and Attacking Google's 'Nearby Connections' on AndroidDaniele Antonioli, Nils Ole Tippenhauer, Kasper Bonne RasmussenNDSS 2019 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Blacktooth: Breaking through the Defense of Bluetooth in SilenceMingrui Ai, Kaiping Xue, Bo Luo, Lutong Chen et al.CCS 2022 · 10 citations
- BLUFFS: Bluetooth Forward and Future Secrecy Attacks and DefensesDaniele AntonioliCCS 2023 · 7 citations
- BLERP: BLE Re-Pairing Attacks and DefensesTommaso Sacchetti, Daniele AntonioliNDSS 2026 · 2 citations
- BadBluetooth: Breaking Android Security Mechanisms via Malicious Bluetooth PeripheralsFenghao Xu, Wenrui Diao, Zhou Li, Jiongyi Chen et al.NDSS 2019 · 51 citations
- Method Confusion Attack on Bluetooth PairingMaximilian von Tschirschnitz, Ludwig Peuckert, Fabian Franzen, Jens GrossklagsS&P 2021 · 42 citations
