A Simple Model of Inference Scaling Laws
Noam Itzhak Levi
Abstract
Neural scaling laws have garnered significant interest due to their ability to predict model performance as a function of increasing parameters, data, and compute. In this work, we propose a simple statistical ansatz based on memorization to study scaling laws in the context of inference, specifically how performance improves with multiple inference attempts. We explore the coverage, or pass@k metric, which measures the chance of success over repeated attempts and provide a motivation for the observed functional form of the inference scaling behavior of the coverage in large language models (LLMs) on reasoning tasks. We then define an "inference loss", which exhibits a power law decay as the number of trials increases, and connect this result with prompting costs. We further test our construction by conducting experiments on a simple generative model, and find that our predictions are in agreement with the empirical coverage curves in a controlled setting. Our simple framework sets the ground for incorporating inference scaling with other known scaling laws.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39993121-1dd7-4cbd-a769-182bf99e2816Cited by top-tier papers10
- Think Only When You Need with Large Hybrid-Reasoning ModelsLingjie Jiang, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Qingxiu Dong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 71 citations
- Rethinking Fine-Tuning when Scaling Test-Time Compute: Limiting Confidence Improves Mathematical ReasoningFeng Chen, Allan Raventós, Nan Cheng, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 39 citations
- s1: Simple test-time scalingNiklas Muennighoff, Zitong Yang, Weijia Shi, Xiang Lisa Li et al.EMNLP 2025 · 33 citations
- UniT: Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Test-time ScalingLeon Liangyu Chen, Haoyu Ma, Zhipeng Fan, Ziqi Huang et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- Learning Shrinks the Hard Tail: Training‑Dependent Inference Scaling in a Solvable Linear ModelNoam Itzhak LeviICLR 2026 · 7 citations
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
- Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural NetworksBlake Bordelon, Abdulkadir Canatar, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2020 · 245 citations
- Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy RegimeHugo Cui, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka ZdeborováNeurIPS 2021 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical ReasoningZelin Tan, Hejia Geng, Xiaohang Yu, Mulei Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model TrainingJakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped TransformersNikunj Saunshi, Nishanth Dikkala, Zhiyuan Li, Sanjiv Kumar et al.ICLR 2025
- Pretraining Scaling Laws for Generative Evaluations of Language ModelsRylan Schaeffer, Noam Levi, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- OptScale: Probabilistic Optimality for Inference-time ScalingYoukang Wang, Jian Wang, Rubing Chen, Xiao-Yong WeiAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
