Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secrets
Florian Tramèr, Reza Shokri, Ayrton San Joaquin, Hoang Le, Matthew Jagielski, Sanghyun Hong, Nicholas Carlini
Abstract
We introduce a new class of attacks on machine learning models. We show that an adversary who can poison a training dataset can cause models trained on this dataset to leak significant private details of training points belonging to other parties. Our active inference attacks connect two independent lines of work targeting the integrity and privacy of machine learning training data. Our attacks are effective across membership inference, attribute inference, and data extraction. For example, our targeted attacks can poison <0.1% of the training dataset to boost the performance of inference attacks by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. Further, an adversary who controls a significant fraction of the training data (e.g., 50%) can launch untargeted attacks that enable 8× more precise inference on all other users' otherwise-private data points. Our results cast doubts on the relevance of cryptographic privacy guarantees in multiparty computation protocols for machine learning, if parties can arbitrarily select their share of training data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers57
- Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is PracticalNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka et al.S&P 2024 · 309 citations
- The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is RelativeNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Chiyuan Zhang, Nicolas Papernot et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 175 citations
- On the Exploitability of Instruction TuningManli Shu, Jiongxiao Wang, Chen Zhu, Jonas Geiping et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 166 citations
- Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning ModelsJiayuan Ye, Aadyaa Maddi, Sasi Kumar Murakonda, Vincent Bindschaedler et al.CCS 2022 · 150 citations
- "Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language ModelsXinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen et al.CCS 2024 · 132 citations
Builds on34
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Yupeng ZhangS&P 2017 · 2,107 citations
Related papers
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model DistillationMatthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Katherine Lee, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 53 citations
- A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning ModelsZitao Chen, Karthik PattabiramanNDSS 2025
- Property Inference from PoisoningSaeed Mahloujifar, Esha Ghosh, Melissa ChaseS&P 2022 · 96 citations
- Leakage of Dataset Properties in Multi-Party Machine LearningWanrong Zhang, Shruti Tople, Olga OhrimenkoUSENIX Security 2021 · 92 citations
