The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative
Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Chiyuan Zhang, Nicolas Papernot, Andreas Terzis, Florian Tramèr
Abstract
Machine learning models trained on private datasets have been shown to leak their private data. While recent work has found that the average data point is rarely leaked, the outlier samples are frequently subject to memorization and, consequently, privacy leakage. We demonstrate and analyse an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable to a privacy attack exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. We perform several experiments to study this effect, and understand why it occurs. The existence of this effect has various consequences. For example, it suggests that proposals to defend against memorization without training with rigorous privacy guarantees are unlikely to be effective. Further, it suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers56
- What makes unlearning hard and what to do about itKairan Zhao, Meghdad Kurmanji, George-Octavian Barbulescu, Eleni Triantafillou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 115 citations
- Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning AttacksJimmy Z. Di, Jack Douglas, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 70 citations
- Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine UnlearningHongsheng Hu, Shuo Wang, Tian Dong, Minhui XueS&P 2024 · 62 citations
- Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model DistillationMatthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Katherine Lee, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 53 citations
- Deep Regression UnlearningAyush Kumar Tarun, Vikram Singh Chundawat, Murari Mandal, Mohan S. KankanhalliICML 2023 · 51 citations
Builds on16
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language ModelsElena Sofia Ruzzetti, Giancarlo A. Xompero, Davide Venditti, Fabio Massimo ZanzottoACL 2025 · 9 citations
- When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes PrivacyMin Chen, Zhikun Zhang, Tianhao Wang, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2021 · 146 citations
- Machine Learning Models that Remember Too MuchCongzheng Song, Thomas Ristenpart, Vitaly ShmatikovCCS 2017 · 582 citations
- Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training ExamplesMatthew Jagielski, Om Thakkar, Florian Tramèr, Daphne Ippolito et al.ICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are VulnerableMartin Bertran Lopez, Shuai Tang, Michael Kearns, Jamie H. Morgenstern et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
