SSR: Safeguarding Staking Rewards by Defining and Detecting Logical Defects in DeFi Staking
Zewei Lin, Jiachi Chen, Jingwen Zhang, Zexu Wang, Yuming Feng, Weizhe Zhang, Zibin Zheng
Abstract
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) staking is one of the most prominent applications within the DeFi ecosystem, where DeFi projects enable users to stake tokens on the platform and reward participants with additional tokens. However, logical defects in DeFi staking could enable attackers to claim unwarranted rewards by manipulating reward amounts, repeatedly claiming rewards, or engaging in other malicious actions. To mitigate these threats, we conducted the first study focused on defining and detecting logical defects in DeFi staking. Through the analysis of 64 security incidents and 144 audit reports, we identified six distinct types of logical defects, each accompanied by detailed descriptions and code examples. Building on this empirical research, we developed SSR (Safeguarding Staking Reward), a static analysis tool designed to detect logical defects in DeFi staking contracts. SSR utilizes a large language model (LLM) to extract fundamental information about staking logic and constructs a DeFi staking model. It then identifies logical defects by analyzing the model and the associated semantic features. We constructed a ground truth dataset based on known security incidents and audit reports to evaluate the effectiveness of SSR. The results indicate that SSR achieves an overall precision of 92.31%, a recall of 87.92%, and an F1-score of 88.85%. Additionally, to assess the prevalence of logical defects in real-world smart contracts, we compiled a large-scale dataset of 15,992 DeFi staking contracts. SSR detected that 3,557 (22.24%) of these contracts contained at least one logical defect.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3759e724-2f43-453c-b1fc-1bb875ffbd90Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
- Ethainter: a smart contract security analyzer for composite vulnerabilitiesLexi Brent, Neville Grech, Sifis Lagouvardos, Bernhard Scholz et al.PLDI 2020 · 163 citations
Related papers
- Detecting Various DeFi Price Manipulations with LLM ReasoningJuantao Zhong, Daoyuan Wu, Ye Liu, Maoyi Xie et al.ASE 2025 · 3 citations
- PromFuzz: Leveraging LLM-Driven and Bug-Oriented Composite Analysis for Detecting Functional Bugs in Smart ContractsXingshuang Lin, Qinge Xie, Binbin Zhao, Yuan Tian et al.ASE 2025 · 5 citations
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu et al.ICSE 2024 · 131 citations
- Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners?Stefanos Chaliasos, Marcos Antonios Charalambous, Liyi Zhou, Rafaila Galanopoulou et al.ICSE 2024 · 49 citations
- OctopusGuard: K-Line Enhanced Token Scam Detector Powered by Multimodal LLMsLitong Sun, YangTian Mi, Xiapu Luo, Weigang WuICSE 2026
