Ethainter: a smart contract security analyzer for composite vulnerabilities
Lexi Brent, Neville Grech, Sifis Lagouvardos, Bernhard Scholz, Yannis Smaragdakis
Abstract
Smart contracts on permissionless blockchains are exposed to inherent security risks due to interactions with untrusted entities. Static analyzers are essential for identifying security risks and avoiding millions of dollars worth of damage.
We introduce Ethainter, a security analyzer checking information flow with data sanitization in smart contracts. Ethainter identifies composite attacks that involve an escalation of tainted information, through multiple transactions, leading to severe violations. The analysis scales to the entire blockchain, consisting of hundreds of thousands of unique smart contracts, deployed over millions of accounts. Ethainter is more precise than previous approaches, as we confirm by automatic exploit generation (e.g., destroying over 800 contracts on the Ropsten network) and by manual inspection, showing a very high precision of 82.5% valid warnings for end-to-end vulnerabilities. Ethainter's balance of precision and completeness offers significant advantages over other tools such as Securify, Securify2, and teEther.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 78f0903c-adc2-4b36-8af2-71429dd15930Cited by top-tier papers53
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu et al.ICSE 2024 · 131 citations
- SmarTest: Effectively Hunting Vulnerable Transaction Sequences in Smart Contracts through Language Model-Guided Symbolic ExecutionSunbeom So, Seongjoon Hong, Hakjoo OhUSENIX Security 2021 · 118 citations
- EVMPatch: Timely and Automated Patching of Ethereum Smart ContractsMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviUSENIX Security 2021 · 103 citations
- Empirical evaluation of smart contract testing: what is the best choice?Meng Ren, Zijing Yin, Fuchen Ma, Zhenyang Xu et al.ISSTA 2021 · 83 citations
- SGUARD: Towards Fixing Vulnerable Smart Contracts AutomaticallyTai D. Nguyen, Long H. Pham, Jun SunS&P 2021 · 69 citations
Builds on7
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
Related papers
- eTainter: detecting gas-related vulnerabilities in smart contractsAsem Ghaleb, Julia Rubin, Karthik PattabiramanISSTA 2022 · 57 citations
- ETHBMC: A Bounded Model Checker for Smart ContractsJoel Frank, Cornelius Aschermann, Thorsten HolzUSENIX Security 2020
- All Your Tokens are Belong to Us: Demystifying Address Verification Vulnerabilities in Solidity Smart ContractsTianle Sun, Ningyu He, Jiang Xiao, Yinliang Yue et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- eThor: Practical and Provably Sound Static Analysis of Ethereum Smart ContractsClara Schneidewind, Ilya Grishchenko, Markus Scherer, Matteo MaffeiCCS 2020 · 9 citations
- Cross-Contract Static Analysis for Detecting Practical Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Smart ContractsYinxing Xue, Mingliang Ma, Yun Lin, Yulei Sui et al.ASE 2020 · 77 citations
