Scalable Interpretability via Polynomials
Abhimanyu Dubey, Filip Radenovic, Dhruv Mahajan
Abstract
Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) have quickly become the leading choice for inherently-interpretable machine learning. However, unlike uninterpretable methods such as DNNs, they lack expressive power and easy scalability, and are hence not a feasible alternative for real-world tasks. We present a new class of GAMs that use tensor rank decompositions of polynomials to learn powerful, inherently-interpretable models. Our approach, titled Scalable Polynomial Additive Models (SPAM) is effortlessly scalable and models all higher-order feature interactions without a combinatorial parameter explosion. SPAM outperforms all current interpretable approaches, and matches DNN/XGBoost performance on a series of real-world benchmarks with up to hundreds of thousands of features. We demonstrate by human subject evaluations that SPAMs are demonstrably more interpretable in practice, and are hence an effortless replacement for DNNs for creating interpretable and high-performance systems suitable for large-scale machine learning. Source code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/nbm-spam.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 31e408ef-8970-4468-9f12-487ee987ced0Cited by top-tier papers13
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- NA2Q: Neural Attention Additive Model for Interpretable Multi-Agent Q-LearningZichuan Liu, Yuanyang Zhu, Chunlin ChenICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Gaussian Process Neural Additive ModelsWei Zhang, Brian Barr, John PaisleyAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Beyond Linear Probes: Dynamic Safety Monitoring for Language ModelsJames Oldfield, Philip Torr, Ioannis Patras, Adel Bibi et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- GRAND-SLAMIN' Interpretable Additive Modeling with Structural ConstraintsShibal Ibrahim, Gabriel Afriat, Kayhan Behdin, Rahul MazumderNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
Builds on8
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsRishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 663 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation VectorsRuihan Zhang, Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Krista A. Ehinger et al.AAAI 2021 · 140 citations
Related papers
- Neural Basis Models for InterpretabilityFilip Radenovic, Abhimanyu Dubey, Dhruv MahajanNeurIPS 2022 · 82 citations
- Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity ApproachShahaf Bassan, Michal Moshkovitz, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep LearningChun-Hao Chang, Rich Caruana, Anna GoldenbergICLR 2022 · 114 citations
- Beyond Additive Decompositions: Interpretability Through SeparabilityJinyang Liu, Munir HiabuICML 2026
- CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive ModelsViet Duong, Qiong Wu, Zhengyi Zhou, Hongjue Zhao et al.KDD 2024 · 6 citations
