Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectors
Ruihan Zhang, Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Krista A. Ehinger, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
Abstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN) models for computer vision are powerful but lack explainability in their most basic form. This deficiency remains a key challenge when applying CNNs in important domains. Recent work on explanations through feature importance of approximate linear models has moved from input-level features (pixels or segments) to features from mid-layer feature maps in the form of concept activation vectors (CAVs). CAVs contain concept-level information and could be learned via clustering. In this work, we rethink the ACE algorithm of Ghorbani et al., proposing an alternative invertible concept-based explanation (ICE) framework to overcome its shortcomings. Based on the requirements of fidelity (approximate models to target models) and interpretability (being meaningful to people), we design measurements and evaluate a range of matrix factorization methods with our framework. We find that non-negative concept activation vectors (NCAVs) from non-negative matrix factorization provide superior performance in interpretability and fidelity based on computational and human subject experiments. Our framework provides both local and global concept-level explanations for pre-trained CNN models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b7e2493-5fcb-4567-a93e-db6264f0a6b2Cited by top-tier papers45
- Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language ModelsPeter Hase, Mohit Bansal, Been Kim, Asma GhandehariounNeurIPS 2023 · 307 citations
- Interpretable Image Recognition by Constructing Transparent Embedding SpaceJiaqi Wang, Huafeng Liu, Xinyue Wang, Liping JingICCV 2021 · 149 citations
- A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance EstimationThomas Fel, Victor Boutin, Louis Béthune, Rémi Cadène et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 125 citations
- Text-To-Concept (and Back) via Cross-Model AlignmentMazda Moayeri, Keivan Rezaei, Maziar Sanjabi, Soheil FeiziICML 2023 · 62 citations
- A Concept-Based Explainability Framework for Large Multimodal ModelsJayneel Parekh, Pegah Khayatan, Mustafa Shukor, Alasdair Newson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- ConEx: Human-Interpretable Saliency Maps via Concept-Aware AttributionYehonatan Elisha, Oren Barkan, Ziv Haddad, Noam KoenigsteinICML 2026
- FACE: Faithful Automatic Concept ExtractionDipkamal Bhusal, Michael Clifford, Sara Rampazzi, Nidhi RastogiNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- GCAV: A Global Concept Activation Vector Framework for Cross-Layer Consistency in InterpretabilityZhenghao He, Sanchit Sinha, Guangzhi Xiong, Aidong ZhangICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- FastCAV: Efficient Computation of Concept Activation Vectors for Explaining Deep Neural NetworksLaines Schmalwasser, Niklas Penzel, Joachim Denzler, Julia NieblingICML 2025
- Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based ExplanationsJonathan Crabbé, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2022 · 88 citations
