FACE: Faithful Automatic Concept Extraction
Dipkamal Bhusal, Michael Clifford, Sara Rampazzi, Nidhi Rastogi
Abstract
Interpreting deep neural networks through concept-based explanations offers a bridge between low-level features and high-level human-understandable semantics. However, existing automatic concept discovery methods often fail to align these extracted concepts with the model's true decision-making process, thereby compromising explanation faithfulness. In this work, we propose FACE (Faithful Automatic Concept Extraction), a novel framework that augments Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) with a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization term to ensure alignment between the model's original and concept-based predictions. Unlike prior methods that operate solely on encoder activations, FACE incorporates classifier supervision during concept learning, enforcing predictive consistency and enabling faithful explanations. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that minimizing the KL divergence bounds the deviation in predictive distributions, thereby promoting faithful local linearity in the learned concept space. Systematic evaluations on ImageNet, COCO, and CelebA datasets demonstrate that FACE outperforms existing methods across faithfulness and sparsity metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 028d2eeb-093b-40b5-bd62-93671fa5c6e9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Concise Explanations of Neural Networks using Adversarial TrainingPrasad Chalasani, Jiefeng Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Xi Wu et al.ICML 2020 · 148 citations
- What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability MethodsJulien Colin, Thomas Fel, Rémi Cadène, Thomas SerreNeurIPS 2022 · 147 citations
- Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation VectorsRuihan Zhang, Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Krista A. Ehinger et al.AAAI 2021 · 140 citations
- The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scoresGiang Nguyen, Daeyoung Kim, Anh NguyenNeurIPS 2021 · 128 citations
- Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc ExplanationsTessa Han, Suraj Srinivas, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2022 · 126 citations
Related papers
- ConEx: Human-Interpretable Saliency Maps via Concept-Aware AttributionYehonatan Elisha, Oren Barkan, Ziv Haddad, Noam KoenigsteinICML 2026
- Non-negative Contrastive LearningYifei Wang, Qi Zhang, Yaoyu Guo, Yisen WangICLR 2024 · 18 citations
- Listen to Interpret: Post-hoc Interpretability for Audio Networks with NMFJayneel Parekh, Sanjeel Parekh, Pavlo Mozharovskyi, Florence d'Alché-Buc et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 32 citations
- FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network DecisionsAmin Parchami-Araghi, Sukrut Rao, Jonas Fischer, Bernt SchieleNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Grounding Counterfactual Explanation of Image Classifiers to Textual Concept SpaceSiwon Kim, Jinoh Oh, Sungjin Lee, Seunghak Yu et al.CVPR 2023
