ConEx: Human-Interpretable Saliency Maps via Concept-Aware Attribution
Yehonatan Elisha, Oren Barkan, Ziv Haddad, Noam Koenigstein
Abstract
Many visual explanation methods in computer vision highlight pixel importance but struggle to link these low-level cues to semantically meaningful concepts, limiting their interpretability and trustworthiness. We introduce Concept-based Explanations (ConEx), a novel framework that bridges saliency visualization with concept-based reasoning to provide both faithfulness and interpretability. ConEx automatically discovers classspecific concepts and represents them through concept activation vectors (CAVs), learned without manual supervision using an architecturespecific masking mechanism that reduces noise introduced by the segmentation masks to enhance concept purity. ConEx generates faithful saliency maps that reveal where each concept appears in the image and how it contributes to the prediction. To evaluate the reliability of these learned concepts, we propose two complementary metrics, Vector-Concept Match (VCM) and Concept-Class Match (CCM), that quantify concept alignment and enable direct comparison with existing methods. Extensive experiments across diverse settings demonstrate that ConEx achieves stateof-the-art performance on faithfulness, segmentation, and concept-quality benchmarks. Overall, ConEx advances the field toward truly interpretable and concept-grounded explanations in vision models. Our code is provided at: https: //github.com/yonisGit/conex
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6d0d3d5-a76f-4588-bc0c-27ba39813bf2Builds on24
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?Maithra Raghu, Thomas Unterthiner, Simon Kornblith, Chiyuan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,553 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
Related papers
- CE-FAM: Concept-Based Explanation via Fusion of Activation MapsMichihiro Kuroki, Toshihiko YamasakiICCV 2025 · 3 citations
- Measuring the (Un)Faithfulness of Concept-Based ExplanationsShubham Kumar, Narendra AhujaCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation VectorsRuihan Zhang, Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Krista A. Ehinger et al.AAAI 2021 · 140 citations
- FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network DecisionsAmin Parchami-Araghi, Sukrut Rao, Jonas Fischer, Bernt SchieleNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Peek Into the Reasoning of Neural Networks: Interpreting With Structural Visual ConceptsYunhao Ge, Yao Xiao, Zhi Xu, Meng Zheng et al.CVPR 2021
