Probabilistic Learning to Defer: Handling Missing Expert Annotations and Controlling Workload Distribution
Cuong C. Nguyen, Thanh-Toan Do, Gustavo Carneiro
Abstract
Recent progress in machine learning research is gradually shifting its focus towards human-AI cooperation due to the advantages of exploiting the reliability of human experts and the efficiency of AI models. One of the promising approaches in human-AI cooperation is learning to defer (L2D), where the system analyses the input data and decides to make its own decision or defer to human experts. Although L2D has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance, in its standard setting, L2D entails a severe limitation: all human experts must annotate the whole training dataset of interest, resulting in a time-consuming and expensive annotation process that can subsequently influence the size and diversity of the training set. Moreover, the current L2D does not have a principled way to control workload distribution among human experts and the AI classifier, which is critical to optimise resource allocation. We, therefore, propose a new probabilistic modelling approach inspired by the mixture-of-experts, where the Expectation -Maximisation algorithm is leverage to address the issue of missing expert's annotations. Furthermore, we introduce a constraint, which can be solved efficiently during the E-step, to control the workload distribution among human experts and the AI classifier. Empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world datasets shows that our proposed probabilistic approach performs competitively, or surpasses previously proposed methods assessed on the same benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,129 citations
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
- Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All ClassifiersRajeev Verma, Eric T. NalisnickICML 2022 · 76 citations
- Post-hoc estimators for learning to defer to an expertHarikrishna Narasimhan, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Aditya Krishna Menon, Ankit Singh Rawat et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 66 citations
- Learning to Defer with Limited Expert PredictionsPatrick Hemmer, Lukas Thede, Michael Vössing, Johannes Jakubik et al.AAAI 2023 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple ExpertsZheng Zhang, Cuong C. Nguyen, Kevin Wells, Thanh-Toan Do et al.AAAI 2026
- Exploiting Human-AI Dependence for Learning to DeferZixi Wei, Yuzhou Cao, Lei FengICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate ExpertsAndrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Barbiero et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Optimized Deferral for Imbalanced SettingsCorinna Cortes, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Confounding-Robust Deferral Policy LearningRuijiang Gao, Mingzhang YinAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
