Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts
Zheng Zhang, Cuong C. Nguyen, Kevin Wells, Thanh-Toan Do, David Rosewarne, Gustavo Carneiro
Abstract
Human-AI cooperative classification (HAI-CC) approaches aim to develop hybrid intelligent systems that enhance decision-making in various high-stakes real-world scenarios by leveraging both human expertise and AI capabilities. Current HAI-CC methods primarily focus on learning-to-defer (L2D), where decisions are deferred to human experts, and learning-to-complement (L2C), where AI and human experts make predictions cooperatively. However, a notable research gap remains in effectively exploring both L2D and L2C under diverse expert knowledge to improve decision-making, particularly when constrained by the cooperation cost required to achieve a target probability for AI-only selection (i.e., coverage). In this paper, we address this research gap by proposing the Coverage-constrained Learning to Defer and Complement with Specific Experts (CL2DC) method. CL2DC makes final decisions through either AI prediction alone or by deferring to or complementing a specific expert, depending on the input data. Furthermore, we propose a coverageconstrained optimisation to control the cooperation cost, ensuring it approximates a target probability for AI-only selection. This approach enables an effective assessment of system performance within a specified budget. Also, CL2DC is designed to address scenarios where training sets contain multiple noisy-label annotations without any clean-label references. Comprehensive evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that CL2DC achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art HAI-CC methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on31
- DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningJunnan Li, Richard Socher, Steven C. H. HoiICLR 2020 · 1,326 citations
- Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human AnnotationsJiaheng Wei, Zhaowei Zhu, Hao Cheng, Tongliang Liu et al.ICLR 2022 · 338 citations
- Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query RoutingDujian Ding, Ankur Mallick, Chi Wang, Robert Sim et al.ICLR 2024 · 282 citations
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
- Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for TeamworkGagan Bansal, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Eric Horvitz et al.AAAI 2021 · 185 citations
Related papers
- Probabilistic Learning to Defer: Handling Missing Expert Annotations and Controlling Workload DistributionCuong C. Nguyen, Thanh-Toan Do, Gustavo CarneiroICLR 2025
- Learning to Defer with Limited Expert PredictionsPatrick Hemmer, Lukas Thede, Michael Vössing, Johannes Jakubik et al.AAAI 2023 · 28 citations
- Optimized Deferral for Imbalanced SettingsCorinna Cortes, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Learning to Help in Multi-Class SettingsYu Wu, Yansong Li, Zeyu Dong, Nitya Sathyavageeswaran et al.ICLR 2025
- Why Ask One When You Can Ask k? Learning-to-Defer to the Top-k ExpertsYannis Montreuil, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang OoiICLR 2026 · 7 citations
