Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements
Michal Klein, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Pierre Ablin, Eugène Ndiaye, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Marco Cuturi
Abstract
Given a source and a target probability measure supported on , the Monge problem asks to find the most efficient way to map one distribution to the other. This efficiency is quantified by defining a cost function between source and target data. Such a cost is often set by default in the machine learning literature to the squared-Euclidean distance, . Recently, Cuturi et. al '23 highlighted the benefits of using elastic costs, defined through a regularizer as . Such costs shape the displacements of Monge maps , i.e., the difference between a source point and its image , by giving them a structure that matches that of the proximal operator of . In this work, we make two important contributions to the study of elastic costs: (i) For any elastic cost, we propose a numerical method to compute Monge maps that are provably optimal. This provides a much-needed routine to create synthetic problems where the ground truth OT map is known, by analogy to the Brenier theorem, which states that the gradient of any convex potential is always a valid Monge map for the cost; (ii) We propose a loss to learn the parameter of a parameterized regularizer , and apply it in the case where . This regularizer promotes displacements that lie on a low dimensional subspace of , spanned by the rows of .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Efficient and Modular Implicit DifferentiationMathieu Blondel, Quentin Berthet, Marco Cuturi, Roy Frostig et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 386 citations
- TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular DynamicsAlexander Tong, Jessie Huang, Guy Wolf, David van Dijk et al.ICML 2020 · 257 citations
- Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networksAshok Vardhan Makkuva, Amirhossein Taghvaei, Sewoong Oh, Jason D. LeeICML 2020 · 254 citations
- Wasserstein-2 Generative NetworksAlexander Korotin, Vage Egiazarian, Arip Asadulaev, Alexander Safin et al.ICLR 2021 · 128 citations
- Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 BenchmarkAlexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Aude Genevay, Justin M. Solomon et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
Related papers
- The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport MapsThéo Uscidda, Marco CuturiICML 2023 · 40 citations
- Monge, Bregman and Occam: Interpretable Optimal Transport in High-Dimensions with Feature-Sparse MapsMarco Cuturi, Michal Klein, Pierre AblinICML 2023 · 19 citations
- Sparsity-Constrained Optimal TransportTianlin Liu, Joan Puigcerver, Mathieu BlondelICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Progressive Entropic Optimal Transport SolversParnian Kassraie, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Michal Klein, James Thornton et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Parameter tuning and model selection in Optimal Transport with semi-dual Brenier formulationAdrien Vacher, François-Xavier VialardNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
