Parameter tuning and model selection in Optimal Transport with semi-dual Brenier formulation
Adrien Vacher, François-Xavier Vialard
Abstract
Over the past few years, numerous computational models have been developed to solve Optimal Transport (OT) in a stochastic setting, where distributions are represented by samples and where the goal is to find the closest map to the ground truth OT map, unknown in practical settings. So far, no quantitative criterion has yet been put forward to tune the parameters of these models and select maps that best approximate the ground truth. To perform this task, we propose to leverage the Brenier formulation of OT. Theoretically, we show that this formulation guarantees that, up to sharp a distortion parameter depending on the smoothness/strong convexity and a statistical deviation term, the selected map achieves the lowest quadratic error to the ground truth. This criterion, estimated via convex optimization, enables parameter tuning and model selection among entropic regularization of OT, input convex neural networks and smooth and strongly convex nearest-Brenier (SSNB) models. We also use this criterion to question the use of OT in Domain-Adaptation (DA). In a standard DA experiment, it enables us to identify the potential that is closest to the true OT map between the source and the target. Yet, we observe that this selected potential is far from being the one that performs best for the downstream transfer classification task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4400ff09-3a50-479f-9af1-18083a1b2ff9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular DynamicsAlexander Tong, Jessie Huang, Guy Wolf, David van Dijk et al.ICML 2020 · 257 citations
- Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networksAshok Vardhan Makkuva, Amirhossein Taghvaei, Sewoong Oh, Jason D. LeeICML 2020 · 254 citations
- Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 BenchmarkAlexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Aude Genevay, Justin M. Solomon et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
- Reliable Weighted Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationRenjun Xu, Pelen Liu, Liyan Wang, Chao Chen et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- The Monge Gap: A Regularizer to Learn All Transport MapsThéo Uscidda, Marco CuturiICML 2023 · 40 citations
- Estimation of Stochastic Optimal Transport MapsSloan Nietert, Ziv GoldfeldNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Sinkhorn: Optimal Transport distances from sample streamsArthur Mensch, Gabriel PeyréNeurIPS 2020 · 35 citations
- A Statistical Learning Perspective on Semi-dual Adversarial Neural Optimal Transport SolversRoman Tarasov, Petr Mokrov, Milena Gazdieva, Evgeny Burnaev et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Overcoming Spurious Solutions in Semi-Dual Neural Optimal Transport: A Smoothing Approach for Learning the Optimal Transport PlanJaemoo Choi, Jaewoong Choi, Dohyun KwonICML 2025
