Progressive Entropic Optimal Transport Solvers
Parnian Kassraie, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Michal Klein, James Thornton, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Marco Cuturi
Abstract
Optimal transport (OT) has profoundly impacted machine learning by providing theoretical and computational tools to realign datasets. In this context, given two large point clouds of sizes and in , entropic OT (EOT) solvers have emerged as the most reliable tool to either solve the Kantorovich problem and output a coupling matrix, or to solve the Monge problem and learn a vector-valued push-forward map. While the robustness of EOT couplings/maps makes them a go-to choice in practical applications, EOT solvers remain difficult to tune because of a small but influential set of hyperparameters, notably the omnipresent entropic regularization strength . Setting can be difficult, as it simultaneously impacts various performance metrics, such as compute speed, statistical performance, generalization, and bias. In this work, we propose a new class of EOT solvers (ProgOT), that can estimate both plans and transport maps. We take advantage of several opportunities to optimize the computation of EOT solutions by dividing mass displacement using a time discretization, borrowing inspiration from dynamic OT formulations, and conquering each of these steps using EOT with properly scheduled parameters. We provide experimental evidence demonstrating that ProgOT is a faster and more robust alternative to standard solvers when computing couplings at large scales, even outperforming neural network-based approaches. We also prove statistical consistency of our approach for estimating optimal transport maps.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cefa563b-9cd0-4bbc-a075-7c48e4c89d02Cited by top-tier papers5
- Geometry-Aware Image Flow MatchingJunho Lee, Kwanseok Kim, Joonseok LeeICML 2026 · 3 citations
- PaSE: Prototype-aligned Calibration and Shapley-based Equilibrium for Multimodal Sentiment AnalysisKang He, Boyu Chen, Yuzhe Ding, Fei Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Hierarchical Refinement: Optimal Transport to Infinity and BeyondPeter Halmos, Julian Gold, Xinhao Liu, Benjamin J. RaphaelICML 2025
- Overcoming Spurious Solutions in Semi-Dual Neural Optimal Transport: A Smoothing Approach for Learning the Optimal Transport PlanJaemoo Choi, Jaewoong Choi, Dohyun KwonICML 2025
- Disentangled Representation Learning with the Gromov-Monge GapThéo Uscidda, Luca Eyring, Karsten Roth, Fabian J. Theis et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on9
- Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch CouplingsAram-Alexandre Pooladian, Heli Ben-Hamu, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Brandon Amos et al.ICML 2023 · 243 citations
- Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 BenchmarkAlexander Korotin, Lingxiao Li, Aude Genevay, Justin M. Solomon et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
- Low-Rank Sinkhorn FactorizationMeyer Scetbon, Marco Cuturi, Gabriel PeyréICML 2021 · 76 citations
- Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and CostsMeyer Scetbon, Gabriel Peyré, Marco CuturiICML 2022 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Entropic Neural Optimal Transport via Diffusion ProcessesNikita Gushchin, Alexander Kolesov, Alexander Korotin, Dmitry P. Vetrov et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 59 citations
- Low-rank Optimal Transport: Approximation, Statistics and DebiasingMeyer Scetbon, Marco CuturiNeurIPS 2022 · 30 citations
- Light Unbalanced Optimal TransportMilena Gazdieva, Arip Asadulaev, Evgeny Burnaev, Aleksandr KorotinNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Sparsity-Constrained Optimal TransportTianlin Liu, Joan Puigcerver, Mathieu BlondelICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- A fast and accurate splitting method for optimal transport: analysis and implementationVien V. Mai, Jacob Lindbäck, Mikael JohanssonICLR 2022 · 15 citations
