OPeRA: A Dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action for Evaluating LLMs on Human Online Shopping Behavior Simulation
Ziyi Wang, Yuxuan Lu, Wenbo Li, Amirali Amini, Bo Sun, Yakov Bart, Weimin Lyu, Jiri Gesi, Tian Wang, Jing Huang, Yu Su, Upol Ehsan
Abstract
Can large language models (LLMs) accurately simulate the next web action of a specific user? While LLMs have shown promising capabilities in generating "believable" human behaviors, evaluating their ability to mimic real user behaviors remains an open challenge, largely due to the lack of high-quality, publicly available datasets that capture both the observable actions and the internal reasoning of an actual human user. To address this gap, we introduce OPeRA, a novel dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action collected from real human participants during online shopping sessions. OPeRA is the first public dataset that comprehensively captures: user personas, browser observations, fine-grained web actions, and self-reported just-in-time rationales. We developed both an online questionnaire and a custom browser plugin to gather this dataset with high fidelity. Using OPeRA, we establish the first benchmark to evaluate how well current LLMs can predict a specific user's next action and rationale with a given persona and <observation, action, rationale> history. This dataset lays the groundwork for future research into LLM agents that aim to act as personalized digital twins for human 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2f64267c-4839-4077-b631-2fe188a2e655Cited by top-tier papers3
- Shop-R1: Rewarding LLMs to Simulate Human Behavior in Online Shopping via Reinforcement LearningYimeng Zhang, Tian Wang, Jiri Gesi, Ziyi Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Can LLM Agents Simulate Multi-Turn Human Behavior? Evidence from Real Online Customer Behavior DataYuxuan Lu, Jing Huang, Yan Han, Bingsheng Yao et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- Through the Lens of Human-Human Collaboration: An Configurable Research Platform for Exploring Human-Agent CollaborationBingsheng Yao, Jiaju Chen, Chaoran Chen, April Yi Wang et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on17
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language AgentsShunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, Karthik NarasimhanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,477 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject StudiesGati V. Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, Adam Tauman KalaiICML 2023 · 651 citations
Related papers
- EcomScriptBench: A Multi-task Benchmark for E-commerce Script Planning via Step-wise Intention-Driven Product AssociationWeiqi Wang, Limeng Cui, Xin Liu, Sreyashi Nag et al.ACL 2025 · 15 citations
- Evaluating LLM Reasoning in the Operations Research Domain with ORQAMahdi Mostajabdaveh, Timothy Tin Long Yu, Samarendra Chandan Bindu Dash, Rindra Ramamonjison et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- A Computational Framework for Evaluating Human-likeness in LLMs' Open-ended Human BehaviorsYuxuan Lei, Jianxun Lian, Defu Lian, Jincenzi Wu et al.ICML 2026
- Persona2Web: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents for Contextual Reasoning with User HistorySerin Kim, Sangam Lee, Dongha LeeICML 2026
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
