Evaluating LLM Reasoning in the Operations Research Domain with ORQA
Mahdi Mostajabdaveh, Timothy Tin Long Yu, Samarendra Chandan Bindu Dash, Rindra Ramamonjison, Jabo Serge Byusa, Giuseppe Carenini, Zirui Zhou, Yong Zhang
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce and apply Operations Research Question Answering (ORQA), a new benchmark, to assess the generalization capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the specialized technical domain of Operations Research (OR). This benchmark is designed to evaluate whether LLMs can emulate the knowledge and reasoning skills of OR experts when given diverse and complex optimization problems. The dataset, crafted by OR experts, presents real-world optimization problems that require multistep reasoning to build their mathematical models. Our evaluations of various open-source LLMs, such as LLaMA 3.1, DeepSeek, and Mixtral reveal their modest performance, indicating a gap in their aptitude to generalize to specialized technical domains. This work contributes to the ongoing discourse on LLMs' generalization capabilities, providing insights for future research in this area. The dataset and evaluation code are publicly available 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fb3606b-536e-4431-afce-0e058641d11dCited by top-tier papers4
- Hierarchical Optimization via LLM-Guided Objective Evolution for Mobility-on-Demand SystemsYi Zhang, Yushen Long, Yun Ni, Liping Huang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Decisionhouse: Prescriptive Analytics in the Data StackMatteo Brucato, Fjodor Kholodkov, Soren Little, Jakob Mayer et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations
- ORLoopBench: Solver-in-the-Loop Benchmarks for Self-Correction and Behavioral Rationality in Operations ResearchRuicheng Ao, David Simchi-Levi, Xinshang WangICML 2026 · 2 citations
- OR-R1: Automating Modeling and Solving of Operations Research Optimization Problem via Test-Time Reinforcement LearningZezhen Ding, Zhen Tan, Jiheng Zhang, Tianlong ChenAAAI 2026
Builds on16
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace et al.ICML 2023 · 623 citations
Related papers
- BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and FinanceMichael Krumdick, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Viet Dac Lai, Varshini Reddy et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
- OPT-Engine: Benchmarking the Limits of LLMs in Optimization Modeling via Complexity ScalingYitian Chen, Cheng Cheng, Yinan Sun, Zi Ling et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Chain-of-Experts: When LLMs Meet Complex Operations Research ProblemsZiyang Xiao, Dongxiang Zhang, Yangjun Wu, Lilin Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 136 citations
- OptiBench Meets ReSocratic: Measure and Improve LLMs for Optimization ModelingZhicheng Yang, Yiwei Wang, Yinya Huang, Zhijiang Guo et al.ICLR 2025
- ACPBench: Reasoning About Action, Change, and PlanningHarsha Kokel, Michael Katz, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin SohrabiAAAI 2025 · 35 citations
