Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
Nan Jiang, Yexiang Xue
Abstract
Symbolic regression, as one of the most crucial tasks in AI for science, discovers governing equations from experimental data. Popular approaches based on genetic programming, Monte Carlo tree search, or deep reinforcement learning learn symbolic regression from a fixed dataset. These methods require massive datasets and long training time especially when learning complex equations involving many variables. Recently, Control Variable Genetic Programming (CVGP) has been introduced which accelerates the regression process by discovering equations from designed control variable experiments. However, the set of experiments is fixed a-priori in CVGP and we observe that sub-optimal selection of experiment schedules delay the discovery process significantly. To overcome this limitation, we propose Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming (Racing-CVGP), which carries out multiple experiment schedules simultaneously. A selection scheme similar to that used in selecting good symbolic equations in the genetic programming process is implemented to ensure that promising experiment schedules eventually win over the average ones. The unfavorable schedules are terminated early to save time for the promising ones. We evaluate Racing-CVGP on several synthetic and real-world datasets corresponding to true physics laws. We demonstrate that Racing-CVGP outperforms CVGP and a series of symbolic regressors which discover equations from fixed datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e587a1a-3bb9-4187-a95c-eacad8825e3cCited by top-tier papers2
- RAG-SR: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Neural Symbolic RegressionHengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf et al.ICLR 2025
- Contrastive Symbolic Regression: Aligned Representations, Adaptive Prediction, and Diverse EnsemblesHengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf et al.ICML 2026
Builds on6
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming SeedingT. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 95 citations
- Monte Carlo Tree Search based Variable Selection for High Dimensional Bayesian OptimizationLei Song, Ke Xue, Xiaobin Huang, Chao QianNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Improving Monte Carlo Tree Search for Symbolic RegressionZhengyao Huang, Daniel Huang, Tiannan Xiao, Dina Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Interpretable Solutions for Multi-Physics PDEs Using T-NNGPLulu Cao, Zexin Lin, Kay Chen Tan, Min JiangAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-SearchPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, Marco VirgolinICML 2023 · 50 citations
- Reinforcement Symbolic Regression MachineYilong Xu, Yang Liu, Hao SunICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- Graph-based Symbolic Regression with Invariance and Constraint EncodingZiyu Xiang, Kenna Ashen, Xiaofeng Qian, Xiaoning QianNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
