Contrastive Symbolic Regression: Aligned Representations, Adaptive Prediction, and Diverse Ensembles
Hengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf, Mengjie Zhang
Abstract
Existing symbolic regression approaches primarily focus on learning explicit input-output mappings, often neglecting relational structures among data instances. This paper introduces Contrastive Symbolic Regression (CSR), a feature-construction-based symbolic regression approach that integrates evolutionary feature construction with contrastive learning to shape a representation space where geometric proximity reflects similarity in the target space. CSR employs a contrastive objective that optimizes a linear transformation of constructed features, with a closed-form solution for aligning the feature space with the target space. The constructed features are applied to K-nearest neighbor regression, where we propose an efficient leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) method that addresses standard LOOCV's computational expense and adaptively selects the neighborhood size, along with a linear-rank weighted K-nearest neighbor variant for faithful assessment of representation quality during evolution. A determinantal point process-based ensemble selection mechanism further enhances robustness by jointly considering model quality and diversity. Extensive experiments on 58 real-world regression datasets demonstrate that CSR consistently surpasses both traditional symbolic regression and modern machine learning counterparts, highlighting CSR as a promising direction for interpretable and effective regression modeling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d623395a-376f-4761-99f9-9a962f5cacf7Builds on23
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular DataSergei Popov, Stanislav Morozov, Artem BabenkoICLR 2020 · 407 citations
- A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionMikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 160 citations
Related papers
- MOD-SR: Unifying Multimodal Learning and Direct Optimization with Gradient-Guided Diffusion Model for Symbolic RegressionChuyang Xiang, Yichen Wei, Junchi YanICML 2026
- Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-SearchPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Guillaume Lample, Sylvain Lamprier, Marco VirgolinICML 2023 · 50 citations
- RAG-SR: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Neural Symbolic RegressionHengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf et al.ICLR 2025
- GenSR: Symbolic regression based on equation generative spaceQian Li, Yuxiao Hu, Juncheng Liu, Yuntian ChenICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Online Symbolic Regression with Informative QueryPengwei Jin, Di Huang, Rui Zhang, Xing Hu et al.AAAI 2023 · 2 citations
