My Precious Crash Data: Barriers and Opportunities in Encouraging Autonomous Driving Companies to Share Safety-Critical Data
Hauke Sandhaus, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Wendy Ju, Qian Yang
Abstract
Safety-critical data, such as crash and near-crash records, are crucial to improving autonomous vehicle (AV) design and development. Sharing such data across AV companies, academic researchers, regulators, and the public can help make all AVs safer. However, AV companies rarely share safety-critical data externally. This paper aims to pinpoint why AV companies are reluctant to share safety-critical data, with an eye on how these barriers can inform new approaches to promote sharing. We interviewed twelve AV company employees who actively work with such data in their day-to-day work. Findings suggest two key, previously unknown barriers to data sharing: (1) Datasets inherently embed salient knowledge that is key to improving AV safety and are resource-intensive. Therefore, data sharing, even within a company, is fraught with politics. (2) Interviewees believed AV safety knowledge is private knowledge that brings competitive edges to their companies, rather than public knowledge for social good. We discuss the implications of these findings for incentivizing and enabling safety-critical AV data sharing, specifically, implications for new approaches to (1) debating and stratifying public and private AV safety knowledge, (2) innovating data tools and data sharing pipelines that enable easier sharing of public AV safety data and knowledge; (3) offsetting costs of curating safety-critical data and incentivizing data sharing.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d8de859-6360-4fec-b2df-8d149f2139a1Builds on8
- Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World SettingsDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Mantas Mazeika, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2022 · 653 citations
- Detecting the Unexpected via Image ResynthesisKrzysztof Lis, Krishna Kanth Nakka, Pascal Fua, Mathieu SalzmannICCV 2019 · 217 citations
- Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and DesiderataAmy Heger, Liz B. Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Hanna M. Wallach et al.CSCW 2022 · 58 citations
- When is Machine Learning Data Good?: Valuing in Public Health DataficationDivy Thakkar, Azra Ismail, Pratyush Kumar, Alex Hanna et al.CHI 2022 · 35 citations
- Interrogating Data Work as a Community of PracticeAnnabel Rothschild, Amanda Meng, Carl DiSalvo, Britney Johnson et al.CSCW 2022 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Work with AI and Work for AI: Autonomous Vehicle Safety Drivers' Lived ExperiencesMengdi Chu, Keyu Zong, Xin Shu, Jiangtao Gong et al.CHI 2023 · 20 citations
- Understand Users' Privacy Perception and Decision of V2X Communication in Connected Autonomous VehiclesZekun Cai, Aiping XiongUSENIX Security 2023
- Exploring Women's Perspectives on Learning and Trust in Automated Vehicles: A Socio-Ecological LensAlaa H. A Abusafia, Ronald Schroeter, Alessandro SoroCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI SafetyAnkolika De, Gabriel Lima, Yixin ZouCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Driving from a Distance: Challenges and Guidelines for Autonomous Vehicle Teleoperation InterfacesFelix Tener, Joel LanirCHI 2022 · 67 citations
