What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
So Yeon Park, Dylan James Moore, David Sirkin
Abstract
Autonomous vehicle (AV) systems are developing at a rapid pace, not only in technological capabilities, but also in human-centered directions. Despite this development, we lack a nuanced understanding of driver preference in decision scenarios that semi-AVs will face, and of possible misalignment between semi-AV decisions and user preference. Using an online survey, we explore how participants would like semi-AVs to act and alert them of the vehicles' decisions in various scenarios. Participants reported varying levels of comfort with autonomy, desire to takeover control, and desire for AV informing. Individual differences, including level of experience with autonomy and situation awareness, affected perceptions of the vehicle. Our results highlight the importance of considering driver preference in AV decision-making, and we present an influence diagram that situates this factor among others. We also derive five design principles, including that a previous positive AV experience can lead to more harmful consequences for AVs when not aligned with driver preference.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 28de5490-c9d6-4b01-8275-da3fd736f0c4Cited by top-tier papers2
- Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionAnnika Stampf, Markus Sasalovici, Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Mark Colley et al.UbiComp 2024 · 5 citations
- Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' SuggestionsShuning Zhang, Xin Yi, Shixuan Li, Chuye Hong et al.CHI 2025
Related papers
- Matching Explanation Detail to Scene Complexity: Studying Situational Awareness-Specific Feedback in Pedestrian Encounter Driving ScenariosMd. Fazle Elahi, Yin-Chun Lu, Jing Chen, Renran TianCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Virtual Morality: Using Virtual Reality to Study Moral Behavior in Extreme Accident SituationsGiulia Benvegnù, Patrik Pluchino, Luciano GamberiniIEEE VR 2021 · 19 citations
- Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance SystemsErnestine Fu, Mishel Johns, David A. B. Hyde, Srinath Sibi et al.CHI 2020 · 12 citations
- ExplAIn Yourself! Transparency for Positive UX in Autonomous DrivingTobias Schneider, Joana Hois, Alischa Rosenstein, Sabiha Ghellal et al.CHI 2021 · 74 citations
- From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing InterfacesJiyao Wang, Song Yan, Xiao Yang, Qihang He et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
