Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
Ernestine Fu, Mishel Johns, David A. B. Hyde, Srinath Sibi, Martin Fischer, David Sirkin
Abstract
Autonomous vehicle system performance is limited by uncertainties inherent in the driving environment and challenges in processing sensor data. Engineers thus face the design decision of biasing systems toward lower sensitivity to potential threats (more misses) or higher sensitivity (more false alarms). We explored this problem for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in Level 3 autonomous vehicles, where the driver is required to monitor the system for failures. Participants (N=48) drove through a simulated suburban environment and experienced detection misses, perfect performance, or false alarms. We found that driver vigilance was greater for less-sensitive braking systems, resulting in improved performance during a potentially fatal failure. In addition, regardless of system bias, greater levels of autonomy resulted in significantly worse driver performance. Our results demonstrate that accounting for the effects of system bias on driver vigilance and performance will be critical design considerations as vehicle autonomy levels increase.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0f7376e0-43f8-43d6-845a-c5e0b42e1ddaCited by top-tier papers3
- How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical MethodologiesOleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCSCW 2021 · 227 citations
- How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?Dan Bennett, Oussama Metatla, Anne Roudaut, Elisa D. MeklerCHI 2023 · 107 citations
- Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionAnnika Stampf, Markus Sasalovici, Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Mark Colley et al.UbiComp 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing InterfacesJiyao Wang, Song Yan, Xiao Yang, Qihang He et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-MakingSo Yeon Park, Dylan James Moore, David SirkinCHI 2020 · 39 citations
- Virtual Morality: Using Virtual Reality to Study Moral Behavior in Extreme Accident SituationsGiulia Benvegnù, Patrik Pluchino, Luciano GamberiniIEEE VR 2021 · 19 citations
- Work with AI and Work for AI: Autonomous Vehicle Safety Drivers' Lived ExperiencesMengdi Chu, Keyu Zong, Xin Shu, Jiangtao Gong et al.CHI 2023 · 20 citations
- What and When to Explain?: On-road Evaluation of Explanations in Highly Automated VehiclesGwangbin Kim, Dohyeon Yeo, Taewoo Jo, Daniela Rus et al.UbiComp 2023 · 34 citations
