Lune

CSCW2021Top-tier venue

How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies

Oleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste Caramiaux

2021Year
227Citations
27Top-tier citations

Abstract

The spread of AI-embedded systems involved in human decision making makes studying human trust in these systems critical. However, empirically investigating trust is challenging. One reason is the lack of standard protocols to design trust experiments. In this paper, we present a survey of existing methods to empirically investigate trust in AI-assisted decision making and analyse the corpus along the constitutive elements of an experimental protocol. We find that the definition of trust is not commonly integrated in experimental protocols, which can lead to findings that are overclaimed or are hard to interpret and compare across studies. Drawing from empirical practices in social and cognitive studies on human-human trust, we provide practical guidelines to improve the methodology of studying Human-AI trust in decision-making contexts. In addition, we bring forward research opportunities of two types: one focusing on further investigation regarding trust methodologies and the other on factors that impact Human-AI trust.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 4d2127d8-daf9-48e2-8728-b57091b69d85

Cited by top-tier papers27

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on6

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines