A comprehensive study of autonomous vehicle bugs
Joshua Garcia, Yang Feng, Junjie Shen, Sumaya Almanee, Yuan Xia, Qi Alfred Chen
Abstract
Self-driving cars, or Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), are increasingly becoming an integral part of our daily life. About 50 corporations are actively working on AVs, including large companies such as Google, Ford, and Intel. Some AVs are already operating on public roads, with at least one unfortunate fatality recently on record. As a result, understanding bugs in AVs is critical for ensuring their security, safety, robustness, and correctness. While previous studies have focused on a variety of domains (e.g., numerical software; machine learning; and error-handling, concurrency, and performance bugs) to investigate bug characteristics, AVs have not been studied in a similar manner. Recently, two software systems for AVs, Baidu Apollo and Autoware, have emerged as frontrunners in the open-source community and have been used by large companies and governments (e.g., Lincoln, Volvo, Ford, Intel, Hitachi, LG, and the US Department of Transportation). From these two leading AV software systems, this paper describes our investigation of 16,851 commits and 499 AV bugs and introduces our classification of those bugs into 13 root causes, 20 bug symptoms, and 18 categories of software components those bugs often affect. We identify 16 major findings from our study and draw broader lessons from them to guide the research community towards future directions in software bug detection, localization, and repair.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8fd678b0-fb40-4e1b-8519-1f875b39357cCited by top-tier papers29
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang et al.FSE 2022 · 85 citations
- DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided FuzzingSeulbae Kim, Major Liu, Junghwan John Rhee, Yuseok Jeon et al.CCS 2022 · 65 citations
- Can We Use Arbitrary Objects to Attack LiDAR Perception in Autonomous Driving?Yi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Tianhang Zheng, Foad Hajiaghajani et al.CCS 2021 · 65 citations
- An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Model Reuse in the Hugging Face Deep Learning Model RegistryWenxin Jiang, Nicholas Synovic, Matt Hyatt, Taylor R. Schorlemmer et al.ICSE 2023 · 62 citations
- An exploratory study of autopilot software bugs in unmanned aerial vehiclesDinghua Wang, Shuqing Li, Guanping Xiao, Yepang Liu et al.FSE 2021 · 60 citations
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Study of Bug-Fix Patterns in Autonomous Driving SystemsYuntianyi Chen, Yuqi Huai, Yirui He, Shilong Li et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- A Comprehensive Study on Code Clones in Automated Driving SoftwareRan Mo, Yingjie Jiang, Wenjing Zhan, Dongyu Wang et al.ASE 2023 · 4 citations
- Doppelgänger Test Generation for Revealing Bugs in Autonomous Driving SoftwareYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Sumaya Almanee, Tuan Ngo et al.ICSE 2023 · 35 citations
- ACAV: A Framework for Automatic Causality Analysis in Autonomous Vehicle Accident RecordingsHuijia Sun, Christopher M. Poskitt, Yang Sun, Jun Sun et al.ICSE 2024 · 11 citations
- An Exploratory Investigation of Log Anomalies in Unmanned Aerial VehiclesDinghua Wang, Shuqing Li, Guanping Xiao, Yepang Liu et al.ICSE 2024 · 5 citations
