Locally Valid and Discriminative Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
Abstract
Crucial for building trust in deep learning models for critical real-world applications is efficient and theoretically sound uncertainty quantification, a task that continues to be challenging. Useful uncertainty information is expected to have two key properties: It should be valid (guaranteeing coverage) and discriminative (more uncertain when the expected risk is high). Moreover, when combined with deep learning (DL) methods, it should be scalable and affect the DL model performance minimally. Most existing Bayesian methods lack frequentist coverage guarantees and usually affect model performance. The few available frequentist methods are rarely discriminative and/or violate coverage guarantees due to unrealistic assumptions. Moreover, many methods are expensive or require substantial modifications to the base neural network. Building upon recent advances in conformal prediction [13, 33] and leveraging the classical idea of kernel regression, we propose Locally Valid and Discriminative prediction intervals (LVD), a simple, efficient, and lightweight method to construct discriminative prediction intervals (PIs) for almost any DL model. With no assumptions on the data distribution, such PIs also offer finite-sample local coverage guarantees (contrasted to the simpler marginal coverage). We empirically verify, using diverse datasets, that besides being the only locally valid method for DL, LVD also exceeds or matches the performance (including coverage rate and prediction accuracy) of existing uncertainty quantification methods, while offering additional benefits in scalability and flexibility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b060dc1-0ad4-491f-83a7-49a9b0fceb14Cited by top-tier papers5
- Conformal Prediction with Temporal Quantile AdjustmentsZhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng SunNeurIPS 2022 · 31 citations
- Conformal Prediction with Missing ValuesMargaux Zaffran, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Julie Josse, Yaniv RomanoICML 2023 · 31 citations
- Improving Uncertainty Quantification of Deep Classifiers via Neighborhood Conformal Prediction: Novel Algorithm and Theoretical AnalysisSubhankar Ghosh, Taha Belkhouja, Yan Yan, Janardhan Rao DoppaAAAI 2023 · 30 citations
- Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-ClassificationEtash Kumar Guha, Shlok Natarajan, Thomas Möllenhoff, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Analyzing Uncertainty of LLM-as-a-Judge: Interval Evaluations with Conformal PredictionHuanxin Sheng, Xinyi Liu, Hangfeng He, Jieyu Zhao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on6
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence FunctionsAhmed M. Alaa, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2020 · 59 citations
- Efficient Conformal Prediction via Cascaded Inference with Expanded AdmissionAdam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina BarzilayICLR 2021 · 53 citations
- Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal PredictionAnastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Michael I. Jordan, Jitendra MalikICLR 2021 · 31 citations
- Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are FragileSamyadeep Basu, Phillip Pope, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Conformal Prediction as Bayesian QuadratureJake C. Snell, Thomas L. GriffithsICML 2025
- CUPS: Improving Human Pose-Shape Estimators with Conformalized Deep UncertaintyHarry Zhang, Luca CarloneICML 2025
- Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean DiscrepancyPeng Cui, Wenbo Hu, Jun ZhuNeurIPS 2020 · 71 citations
- Approximating Full Conformal Prediction for Neural Network Regression with Gauss-Newton InfluenceDharmesh Tailor, Alvaro H. C. Correia, Eric T. Nalisnick, Christos LouizosICLR 2025
- PAC-Bayes Generalization Certificates for Learned Inductive Conformal PredictionApoorva Sharma, Sushant Veer, Asher J. Hancock, Heng Yang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
