Approximating Full Conformal Prediction for Neural Network Regression with Gauss-Newton Influence
Dharmesh Tailor, Alvaro H. C. Correia, Eric T. Nalisnick, Christos Louizos
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification is an important prerequisite for the deployment of deep learning models in safety-critical areas. Yet, this hinges on the uncertainty estimates being useful to the extent the prediction intervals are well-calibrated and sharp. In the absence of inherent uncertainty estimates (e.g., pretrained models predicting only point estimates), popular approaches that operate post-hoc include Laplace's method and split conformal prediction (split-CP). However, Laplace's method can be miscalibrated when the model is misspecified and split-CP requires sample splitting, and thus comes at the expense of statistical efficiency. In this work, we construct prediction intervals for neural network regressors post-hoc without held-out data. This is achieved by approximating the full conformal prediction method (full-CP). Whilst full-CP nominally requires retraining the model for every test point and candidate label, we propose to train just once and locally perturb model parameters using Gauss-Newton influence to approximate the effect of retraining. Coupled with linearization of the network, we express the absolute residual nonconformity score as a piecewise linear function of the candidate label allowing for an efficient procedure that avoids the exhaustive search over the output space. On standard regression benchmarks and bounding box localization, we show the resulting prediction intervals are locally-adaptive and often tighter than those of split-CP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e20d745-1db2-4c87-b6e0-e5af013dc9adBuilds on17
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine UnlearningAyush Sekhari, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ananda Theertha SureshNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing FlowsAdriel Sosa Marco, John Daniel Kirwan, Alexia Toumpa, Simos GerasimouNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Improving Uncertainty Quantification of Deep Classifiers via Neighborhood Conformal Prediction: Novel Algorithm and Theoretical AnalysisSubhankar Ghosh, Taha Belkhouja, Yan Yan, Janardhan Rao DoppaAAAI 2023 · 30 citations
- Learning Optimal Conformal ClassifiersDavid Stutz, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Ali Taylan Cemgil, Arnaud DoucetICLR 2022 · 123 citations
- Leave-One-Out Stable Conformal PredictionKiljae Lee, Yuan ZhangICLR 2025
- COMPASS: Robust Feature Conformal Prediction for Medical Segmentation MetricsMatt Y. Cheung, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Guha BalakrishnanICLR 2026 · 5 citations
