Remote, but Connected: How #TidyTuesday Provides an Online Community of Practice for Data Scientists
Nischal Shrestha, Titus Barik, Chris Parnin
Abstract
Data science practitioners face the challenge of continually honing their skills such as data wrangling and visualization. As data scientists seek online spaces to network, learn and share resources with one another, each individual has to employ their own ad-hoc strategy to practice their data science skills. Given these disjointed efforts, it is crucial to ask: how can we build an inclusive, welcoming online community of practice that unites data scientists in their collective efforts to become experts? Daily hashtags on Twitter are used on specific days and have shown promise in forming a community of practice (CoP) in social networking sites like Twitter, but how do they benefit the community and its members? To understand how daily hashtags benefit data scientists and form an online CoP, we conducted a qualitative study on #TidyTuesday-a daily hashtag project for data scientists using R-using the framework of CoP as a lens for analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 participants and uncovered motivations behind their participation in #TidyTuesday, how the project benefited them, and how it cultivated an online CoP. Our findings contribute to the CSCW research on community of practices by providing design trade-offs of using daily hashtags on Twitter, and guidelines on growing and sustaining an online community of practice for data scientists.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2aa1aa2f-a049-4ae4-a2c4-ecf48c5c5174Cited by top-tier papers6
- Diff in the Loop: Supporting Data Comparison in Exploratory Data AnalysisApril Yi Wang, Will Epperson, Robert A. DeLine, Steven Mark DruckerCHI 2022 · 34 citations
- Help Me #DebunkThis: Unpacking Individual and Community's Collaborative Work in Information Credibility AssessmentLu He, Changyang HeCSCW 2022 · 16 citations
- Faulty or Ready? Handling Failures in Deep-Learning Computer Vision Models until Deployment: A Study of Practices, Challenges, and NeedsAgathe Balayn, Natasa Rikalo, Jie Yang, Alessandro BozzonCHI 2023 · 10 citations
- Many Destinations, Many Pathways: A Quantitative Analysis of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in ScratchRuijia Cheng, Benjamin Mako HillCSCW 2022 · 10 citations
- How Data Analysts Use a Visualization Grammar in PracticeXiaoying Pu, Matthew KayCHI 2023 · 10 citations
Builds on3
- How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and ToolsAmy X. Zhang, Michael J. Muller, Dakuo WangCSCW 2020 · 260 citations
- What's Wrong with Computational Notebooks? Pain Points, Needs, and Design OpportunitiesSouti Chattopadhyay, Ishita Prasad, Austin Z. Henley, Anita Sarma et al.CHI 2020 · 162 citations
- Data Analysts and Their Software Practices: A Profile of the Sabermetrics Community and BeyondJustin Middleton, Emerson R. Murphy-Hill, Kathryn T. StoleeCSCW 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Interrogating Data Work as a Community of PracticeAnnabel Rothschild, Amanda Meng, Carl DiSalvo, Britney Johnson et al.CSCW 2022 · 29 citations
- Model Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data ScienceScott Allen Cambo, Darren GergleCHI 2022 · 49 citations
- Eliciting Best Practices for Collaboration with Computational NotebooksLuigi Quaranta, Fabio Calefato, Filippo LanubileCSCW 2022 · 29 citations
- On the Design of AI-powered Code Assistants for NotebooksAndrew M. McNutt, Chenglong Wang, Robert A. DeLine, Steven Mark DruckerCHI 2023 · 78 citations
- Understanding Data Visualization Design PracticePaul ParsonsIEEE VIS 2021 · 53 citations
