What's Wrong with Computational Notebooks? Pain Points, Needs, and Design Opportunities
Souti Chattopadhyay, Ishita Prasad, Austin Z. Henley, Anita Sarma, Titus Barik
Abstract
Computational notebooks - such as Azure, Databricks, and Jupyter - are a popular, interactive paradigm for data scientists to author code, analyze data, and interleave visualizations, all within a single document. Nevertheless, as data scientists incorporate more of their activities into notebooks, they encounter unexpected difficulties, or pain points, that impact their productivity and disrupt their workflow. Through a systematic, mixed-methods study using semi-structured interviews (n=20) and survey (n=156) with data scientists, we catalog nine pain points when working with notebooks. Our findings suggest that data scientists face numerous pain points throughout the entire workflow - from setting up notebooks to deploying to production - across many notebook environments. Our data scientists report essential notebook requirements, such as supporting data exploration and visualization. The results of our study inform and inspire the design of computational notebooks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9368a8d6-a54f-4a8b-b746-71b27c054f1aCited by top-tier papers45
- Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and ProcessNadia Nahar, Shurui Zhou, Grace A. Lewis, Christian KästnerICSE 2022 · 122 citations
- B2: Bridging Code and Interactive Visualization in Computational NotebooksYifan Wu, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Arvind SatyanarayanUIST 2020 · 71 citations
- Telling Stories from Computational Notebooks: AI-Assisted Presentation Slides Creation for Presenting Data Science WorkChengbo Zheng, Dakuo Wang, April Yi Wang, Xiaojuan MaCHI 2022 · 53 citations
- Improving Steering and Verification in AI-Assisted Data Analysis with Interactive Task DecompositionMajeed Kazemitabaar, Jack Williams, Ian Drosos, Tovi Grossman et al.UIST 2024 · 49 citations
- Fine-Grained Lineage for Safer Notebook InteractionsStephen Macke, Aditya G. Parameswaran, Hongpu Gong, Doris Jung Lin Lee et al.VLDB 2021 · 46 citations
Related papers
- Notable: On-the-fly Assistant for Data Storytelling in Computational NotebooksHaotian Li, Lu Ying, Haidong Zhang, Yingcai Wu et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- On the Design of AI-powered Code Assistants for NotebooksAndrew M. McNutt, Chenglong Wang, Robert A. DeLine, Steven Mark DruckerCHI 2023 · 78 citations
- Fork It: Supporting Stateful Alternatives in Computational NotebooksNathaniel Weinman, Steven Mark Drucker, Titus Barik, Robert DeLineCHI 2021 · 55 citations
- Eliciting Best Practices for Collaboration with Computational NotebooksLuigi Quaranta, Fabio Calefato, Filippo LanubileCSCW 2022 · 29 citations
- How Scientists Use Jupyter Notebooks: Goals, Quality Attributes, and OpportunitiesRuanqianqian (Lisa) Huang, Savitha Ravi, Michael He, Boyu Tian et al.ICSE 2025 · 3 citations
