Private frequency estimation via projective geometry
Vitaly Feldman, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen, Kunal Talwar
Abstract
In this work, we propose a new algorithm ProjectiveGeometryResponse (PGR) for locally differentially private (LDP) frequency estimation. For a universe size of and with users, our -LDP algorithm has communication cost bits in the private coin setting and in the public coin setting, and has computation cost for the server to approximately reconstruct the frequency histogram, while achieving the state-of-the-art privacy-utility tradeoff. In many parameter settings used in practice this is a significant improvement over the computation cost that is achieved by the recent PI-RAPPOR algorithm (Feldman and Talwar; 2021). Our empirical evaluation shows a speedup of over 50x over PI-RAPPOR while using approximately 75x less memory for practically relevant parameter settings. In addition, the running time of our algorithm is within an order of magnitude of HadamardResponse (Acharya, Sun, and Zhang; 2019) and RecursiveHadamardResponse (Chen, Kairouz, and Ozgur; 2020) which have significantly worse reconstruction error. The error of our algorithm essentially matches that of the communication- and time-inefficient but utility-optimal SubsetSelection (SS) algorithm (Ye and Barg; 2017). Our new algorithm is based on using Projective Planes over a finite field to define a small collection of sets that are close to being pairwise independent and a dynamic programming algorithm for approximate histogram reconstruction on the server side. We also give an extension of PGR, which we call HybridProjectiveGeometryResponse, that allows trading off computation time with utility smoothly.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29b11d7f-a78f-4f73-97e9-17180e12f29fCited by top-tier papers9
- Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean EstimationWei-Ning Chen, Dan Song, Ayfer Özgür, Peter KairouzNeurIPS 2023 · 42 citations
- Exact Optimality of Communication-Privacy-Utility Tradeoffs in Distributed Mean EstimationBerivan Isik, Wei-Ning Chen, Ayfer Özgür, Tsachy Weissman et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
- Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data AnalysisKunal Talwar, Shan Wang, Audra McMillan, Vitaly Feldman et al.CCS 2024 · 6 citations
- Private Frequency Estimation via Residue Number SystemsHéber Hwang ArcoleziAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions Under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet ExpansionPuning Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Bo Sun, Li Shen et al.S&P 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on3
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
- Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local RandomizersVitaly Feldman, Kunal TalwarICML 2021 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Sparse Estimation Under Local Differential Privacy at All Privacy LevelsPuning Zhao, Qingqing Ye, Shaowei Wang, Jun Feng et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
- Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and StreamingZiyue Huang, Yuan Qiu, Ke Yi, Graham CormodeVLDB 2022 · 28 citations
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 22 citations
- PCKV: Locally Differentially Private Correlated Key-Value Data Collection with Optimized UtilityXiaolan Gu, Ming Li, Yueqiang Cheng, Li Xiong et al.USENIX Security 2020
- Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy ModelsBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2022 · 6 citations
