AI LEGO: Scaffolding Cross-Functional Collaboration in Industrial Responsible AI Practices during Early Design Stages
Muzhe Wu, Yanzhi Zhao, Shuyi Han, Michael Xieyang Liu, Hong Shen
Abstract
Responsible AI (RAI) efforts increasingly emphasize the importance of addressing potential harms early in the AI development lifecycle through social-technical lenses. However, in cross-functional industry teams, this work is often stalled by a persistent coordination challenge: how technical roles hand off technical intent, how teams establish shared structures for collaboration, and how non-technical roles are supported in systematically evaluating harms. Through literature review and a semi-structured interview study with 8 practitioners, we unpack how this challenge manifests-technical design choices are rarely handed off in ways that support meaningful engagement by non-technical roles; collaborative workflows lack shared, visual structures to support mutual understanding; and non-technical practitioners are left without scaffolds for systematic harm evaluation. Existing tools like JIRA or Google Docs, while useful for product tracking, are ill-suited for supporting joint harm identification across roles, often requiring significant extra effort to align understanding. To address this, we developed AI LEGO, a web-based prototype that operationalizes the boundary object theory to support cross-functional AI practitioners in effectively facilitating knowledge handoff and identifying harmful design choices in the early design stages. Technical roles use interactive blocks to draft development plans, while non-technical roles engage with those blocks through stage-specific checklists and LLM-driven persona simulations to surface potential harms. In a study with 18 cross-functional practitioners, AI LEGO increased the volume and likelihood of harms identified compared to baseline worksheets. Participants found that its modular structure and persona prompts made harm identification more accessible, fostering clearer and more collaborative RAI practices in early design.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Computer supported cooperative work; Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; Interactive systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on21
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for Shifting Organizational PracticesBogdana Rakova, Jingying Yang, Henriette Cramer, Rumman ChowdhuryCSCW 2021 · 326 citations
- How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and ToolsAmy X. Zhang, Michael J. Muller, Dakuo WangCSCW 2020 · 260 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case StudyDavid Piorkowski, Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Dakuo Wang et al.CSCW 2021 · 142 citations
Related papers
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- "The Conduit by which Change Happens": Processes, Barriers, and Support for Interpersonal Learning about Responsible AIJaemarie Solyst, Lauren Wilcox, Michael MadaioCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- "It is currently hodgepodge": Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI ValuesRama Adithya Varanasi, Nitesh GoyalCHI 2023 · 52 citations
- A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness EvaluationsGlen Berman, Nitesh Goyal, Michael MadaioCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical RolesMarios Constantinides, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio et al.CSCW 2024 · 28 citations
