Event Grounded Criminal Court View Generation with Cooperative (Large) Language Models
Linan Yue, Qi Liu, Lili Zhao, Li Wang, Weibo Gao, Yanqing An
Abstract
With the development of legal intelligence, Criminal Court View Generation has attracted much attention as a crucial task of legal intelligence, which aims to generate concise and coherent texts that summarize case facts and provide explanations for verdicts. Existing researches explore the key information in case facts to yield the court views. Most of them employ a coarse-grained approach that partitions the facts into broad segments (e.g., verdict-related sentences) to make predictions. However, this approach fails to capture the complex details present in the case facts, such as various criminal elements and legal events. To this end, in this paper, we propose an Event Grounded Generation (EGG) method for criminal court view generation with cooperative (Large) Language Models, which introduces the fine-grained event information into the generation. Specifically, we first design a LLMs-based extraction method that can extract events in case facts without massive annotated events. Then, we incorporate the extracted events into court view generation by merging case facts and events. Besides, considering the computational burden posed by the use of LLMs in the extraction phase of EGG, we propose a LLMs-free EGG method that can eliminate the requirement for event extraction using LLMs in the inference phase. Extensive experimental results on a real-world dataset clearly validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 270cb143-c113-49ec-b554-9cbf0d0c679dCited by top-tier papers2
- LegalChainReasoner: Grounding Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation via Structured Legal ChainsWeizhe Shi, Qiqi Wang, Yihong Pan, Qian Liu et al.ACL 2026
- CAD-Editor: A Locate-then-Infill Framework with Automated Training Data Synthesis for Text-Based CAD EditingYu Yuan, Shizhao Sun, Qi Liu, Jiang BianICML 2025
Builds on11
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Iteratively Questioning and Answering for Interpretable Legal Judgment PredictionHaoxi Zhong, Yuzhong Wang, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 133 citations
- NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment PredictionLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Binbin Jin, Han Wu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 83 citations
- De-Biased Court's View Generation with CausalityYiquan Wu, Kun Kuang, Yating Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu et al.EMNLP 2020 · 71 citations
Related papers
- Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case ReformulationChenlong Deng, Kelong Mao, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements GenerationChaeeun Kim, Jinu Lee, Wonseok HwangEMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- CoCoLex: Confidence-guided Copy-based Decoding for Grounded Legal Text GenerationT. Y. S. S. Santosh, Youssef Tarek Elkhayat, Oana Ichim, Pranav Shetty et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- Unstructured Evidence Attribution for Long Context Query Focused SummarizationDustin Wright, Zain Muhammad Mujahid, Lu Wang, Isabelle Augenstein et al.EMNLP 2025
- CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case RetrievalKun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian et al.KDD 2023 · 9 citations
