De-Biased Court's View Generation with Causality
Yiquan Wu, Kun Kuang, Yating Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu, Changlong Sun, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, Luo Si, Fei Wu
Abstract
Court's view generation is a novel but essential task for legal AI, aiming at improving the interpretability of judgment prediction results and enabling automatic legal document generation. While prior text-to-text natural language generation (NLG) approaches can be used to address this problem, neglecting the confounding bias from the data generation mechanism can limit the model performance, and the bias may pollute the learning outcomes. In this paper, we propose a novel Attentional and Counterfactual based Natural Language Generation (AC-NLG) method, consisting of an attentional encoder and a pair of innovative counterfactual decoders. The attentional encoder leverages the plaintiff's claim and fact description as input to learn a claim-aware encoder from which the claim-related information in fact description can be emphasized. The counterfactual decoders are employed to eliminate the confounding bias in data and generate judgmentdiscriminative court's views (both supportive and non-supportive views) by incorporating with a synergistic judgment predictive model. Comprehensive experiments show the effectiveness of our method under both quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM The plaintiff A claimed that the defendant B should return the loan of 29,500 from the plaintiff A, and agreed to return after one month. After the loan expired, the defendant failed to return Fact . COURT'S VIEW The court concluded that the loan relationship between the plaintiff A and the defendant B is valid. The defendant failed to return the money on time Ra tiona le . Therefore, the plaintiff's claim on principle was supported Acceptance according to law. The court did not support the plaintiff's claim on interest Rejection because the evidence was insufficient Rationale .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 582276cb-818f-48d0-a181-505a280d967eCited by top-tier papers32
- LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language ModelsXinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 994 citations
- Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias AmplificationWenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang et al.KDD 2021 · 155 citations
- NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment PredictionLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Binbin Jin, Han Wu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 83 citations
- A Causal Lens for Controllable Text GenerationZhiting Hu, Li Erran LiNeurIPS 2021 · 77 citations
- End-to-End Modeling via Information Tree for One-Shot Natural Language Spatial Video GroundingMengze Li, Tianbao Wang, Haoyu Zhang, Shengyu Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 46 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural NetworksLeilei Gan, Kun Kuang, Yi Yang, Fei WuAAAI 2021 · 72 citations
- CFGL-LCR: A Counterfactual Graph Learning Framework for Legal Case RetrievalKun Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, Qi Tian et al.KDD 2023 · 9 citations
- Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court SettingLuyao Ma, Yating Zhang, Tianyi Wang, Xiaozhong Liu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 52 citations
- Event Grounded Criminal Court View Generation with Cooperative (Large) Language ModelsLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Lili Zhao, Li Wang et al.SIGIR 2024 · 5 citations
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
