Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

CLEAR: A Framework Enabling Large Language Models to Discern Confusing Legal Paragraphs

Qi Xu, Qian Liu, Hao Fei, Hang Yu, Shuhao Guan, Xiao Wei

Abstract

Most of the existing work focuses on enabling LLMs to leverage legal rules (e.g., law articles) to tackle complex legal reasoning tasks, but largely overlooks their ability to understand legal rules.To better evaluate the LLMs' capabilities in this regard, in this work, we propose a new challenge task: Legal Paragraph Prediction (LPP), which aims to predict the legal paragraph given criminal facts.Moreover, to enhance the legal reasoning ability of LLMs, we propose a novel framework CLEAR, enabling LLMs to analyze legal cases with the guidance of legal rule insights.CLEAR consists of four key components, where the Legal Rules Retriever aims to retrieve legal rule knowledge, and the Rule Insights Generator is used to generate legal insights guiding the LLM's reasoning, then the Case Analyzer analyze the case with the guidance of legal rule insights given criminal facts.Finally, the Legal Reasoner synthesizes the criminal facts, legal rule insights, and analysis results to derive the final decision.By conducting extensive experiments on a real-world dataset, experimental results validate the effectiveness of our proposed model.Our codes and dataset are available at https://github.com/xuqi220/CLEAR. Warning!!! This paper contains discussions of violent criminal activities. Discretion is advised.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on24

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  2. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  3. Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
  4. Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
  5. NExT-GPT: Any-to-Any Multimodal LLMShengqiong Wu, Hao Fei, Leigang Qu, Wei Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 786 citations

Related papers

  1. GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment PredictionXinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng, Zhicheng DouACL 2026 · 5 citations
  2. Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent CollaborationWeikang Yuan, Junjie Cao, Zhuoren Jiang, Yangyang Kang et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 14 citations
  3. Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment PredictionChenlong Deng, Kelong Mao, Yuyao Zhang, Zhicheng DouEMNLP Findings 2024 · 17 citations
  4. Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
  5. A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and ExperiencesJiaxin Shen, Jinan Xu, Huiqi Hu, Luyi Lin et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 2 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines